Articles: analgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Epidural infusions of sufentanil with and without bupivacaine: comparison with diamorphine-bupivacaine.
The requirements for supplementary 3 ml epidural injections of bupivacaine 0.5% (top-ups) were used in a randomized double-blind study to compare the effects of five types of thoracic epidural infusions given at 2.5 ml h-1 for the first 24 h after major surgery to the upper abdomen in 99 patients and the lower abdomen in 72. The infusions were: bupivacaine 0.167% alone; diamorphine 0.167 mg ml-1 (0.417 mg h-1) in bupivacaine 0.167%; sufentanil 2 micrograms ml-1 (5 micrograms h-1) in 0.167% bupivacaine; sufentanil 4 micrograms ml-1 (10 micrograms h-1) in 0.167% bupivacaine; and sufentanil 4 micrograms ml-1 (10 micrograms h-1) in normal saline. The patients who had upper abdominal surgery were on average older than those having lower abdominal surgery and a larger proportion of them were female. ⋯ Although the two sufentanil-bupivacaine mixtures were indistinguishable in analgesic effectiveness after either upper or lower abdominal surgery, the lower (5 micrograms h-1) dose rate of sufentanil gave a significantly higher average breathing rate and lower average PaCO2 for the first 24 h after lower (but not upper) abdominal surgery. Blood samples were taken (as an afterthought) from 11 patients receiving sufentanil 10 micrograms h-1, just before the epidural infusion was stopped. The concentrations were mostly above the range for systemic analgesia, but below the values that would have been expected if a steady state had been achieved.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jul 1994
Spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section following epidural analgesia in labour: a relative contraindication.
Three cases are described in which epidural analgesia was performed during labour using an infusion of bupivacaine 0.125-0.25%. When, in all 3 cases, caesarean section was required for failure to progress, hyperbaric bupivacaine was given in doses of 10 mg, 12.5 mg and 15 mg respectively. Within 2-4 min all 3 patients had a high block, complained of difficulty in breathing and subsequently developed apnoea. ⋯ All three mothers remain in good health and do not regret having had spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section. In contrast to previously reported cases of high spinal anaesthesia following unsuccessful epidural anaesthesia for caesarean section, this report describes 3 cases of high spinal following the administration of spinal anaesthesia upon an ongoing epidural infusion of local anaesthetic during labour. As no guidelines are available as to the recommended dose of spinal anaesthetic under such circumstances and, in view of the several case reports describing a similar complication under different circumstances, we suggest that spinal anaesthesia is contraindicated upon ongoing epidural analgesia or following a failed epidural.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Pre-emptive analgesia from intravenous administration of opioids. No effect with alfentanil.
Forty patients undergoing total abdominal hysterectomy were randomly allocated to receive either 40 micrograms.kg-1 of alfentanil on induction of anaesthesia or 40 micrograms.kg-1 of alfentanil after the skin incision. Postoperative pain relief was provided with morphine from a patient-controlled analgesia system. ⋯ There were no differences found between the two groups for morphine consumption but the 'pre-emptive' group had significantly higher pain scores at rest. We conclude that there is no clinically useful pre-emptive analgesic effect with this dose of alfentanil and that therefore systemic opioid premedication is unlikely to decrease postoperative analgesic requirements through the mechanism of pre-emptive analgesia.
-
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim · Jul 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Utility of epidural catheterization by the caudal route in pediatric anesthesia].
To compare analgesic effect of bupivacaine during and after surgery when delivered through a lumbar epidural catheter entering by the caudal route with either caudal or lumbar administration of anesthetic through the needle. ⋯ Epidural anesthesia by way of a catheter entering by the caudal space allows us to achieve intra- and postoperative analgesia of comparable quality to that afforded by a lumbar approach or a single direct caudal puncture.