Articles: analgesia.
-
Postoperative pain can intensify the sympathoadrenergic reaction, which is commonly seen after surgery, and thus possibly pave the way for certain complications, such as coronary ischemia, bronchopneumonia, intestinal stasis, thromboembolism, infection, sepsis, and metabolic disturbances. Investigations of cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, metabolic, and immunologic function indicate that high-quality pain relief can diminish postoperative organ impairment and failure. Some aspects of the improvements attributed to the quality of analgesia, such as prevention of tachycardia and hypertension, attenuation of hyperglycemia and catabolism, improvement of gastrointestinal motility and cellular immunity cannot be definitely distinguished from the effects of sympathetic blockade due to epidural analgesia with local anesthetics, however. ⋯ Some studies indicate that better analgesia is advantageous for the patient, especially with respect to postoperative complications, hospital stay, long-term well being, and costs. In other clinical trials incorporating more patients, however, this hypothesis had to be rejected. At present, therefore, we cannot state that effective pain relief influences postoperative morbidity and mortality.
-
At present, intramuscular application of opioids given on request is the most widespread form of postoperative analgesia. This method is widely recognized as often being inadequate, however. As advanced techniques of pain management, such as patient-controlled analgesia, are not generally available, the question arises as to whether non-opioid analgesics should routinely be used in order to improve this situation. ⋯ Despite these results, it must be borne in mind that most studies have been carried out on patients of ASA groups I and II and that conclusions drawn from the literature are not necessarily representative for the elderly and for patients with organ failure. Alternative substances have received relatively little attention. Of these, the pyrazolone derivative, metamizol, may well prove to be of value for patients in whom the use of NSAIDS is contraindicated or relatively ineffective such as after biliary tract surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1993
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized double-blind comparison of epidural sufentanil versus intravenous sufentanil or epidural fentanyl analgesia after major abdominal surgery.
This randomized double-blind study compared epidural sufentanil (SEPI) with intravenous sufentanil (SIV) or epidural fentanyl (FEPI) analgesia in 45 patients after major abdominal operations. On first complaint of severe postoperative pain, SIV patients were given a 15-micrograms bolus and then a 5 micrograms/h infusion of sufentanil intravenously. SEPI patients were given the same bolus and infusion, but epidurally. ⋯ The relative analgesic potencies (AP) calculated from the equianalgesic dose requirement ratios were 1.4 for AP-sufentanil IV/EPI and 4.2 for AP-epidural F/S. SIV patients required more supplementary boluses than SEPI patients, were more sedated during the entire treatment, and had higher PaCO2 and higher serum sufentanil concentrations within the first 3 h of treatment. In addition, severe respiratory depression occurred in four SIV patients soon after the start of treatment, despite serum sufentanil concentrations of less than 0.3 ng/mL.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Thoracic versus lumbar epidural fentanyl for postthoracotomy pain.
Thirty patients were prospectively randomized to receive either thoracic or lumbar epidural fentanyl infusion for postthoracotomy pain. Epidural catheters were inserted, and placement was confirmed with local anesthetic testing before operation. General anesthesia consisted of nitrous oxide, oxygen, isoflurane, intravenous fentanyl citrate (5 micrograms/kg), and vecuronium bromide. ⋯ The infusion rate needed to maintain a visual analogue scale score of less than 4 was lower in the thoracic group (1.55 +/- 0.13 micrograms.kg-1 x h-1) than in the lumbar group (2.06 +/- 0.19 microgram.kg-1 x h-1) during the first 4 hours after operation (p < or = 0.05). The epidural fentanyl infusion rates could be reduced at 4, 24, and 48 hours after operation without compromising pain relief. Four patients in the lumbar group required naloxone hydrochloride intravenously.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
The safety of epidural analgesia in labour and its effect on delivery--a case control study in Pakistani women.
To assess the safety and effect of epidural analgesia on the course of labour and delivery in Pakistani women, a retrospective case control study was conducted from November, 1986 to November, 1991 (5 years) at the Aga Khan University Medical Centre, Karachi. All patients (n = 64) who received epidural analgesia for labour (cases) were compared with randomly selected patients (n = 18) who did not receive epidural analgesia during labour (controls). ⋯ The incidence of malposition of foetal vertex at delivery and that of instrumental (forceps) deliveries was significantly higher (P < 0.05 and < 0.01 respectively) in the epidural group as compared to controls. The incidence of complications was low and the acceptance and tolerance of epidural analgesia was good in our patients.