Articles: analgesia.
-
Comparative Study
Effects of instructional set on attributions of nonvolition during hypnotic and nonhypnotic analgesia.
Fifty highly hypnotizable subjects were assigned to four treatment groups or a no-treatment control group and then underwent two pain stimulation trials. Half the treated subjects were administered hypnotic analgesia, half waking analgesia. ⋯ Both hypnotic and nonhypnotic subjects given passive instructions rated their pain reduction as occurring involuntarily, whereas those given active instructions reported that their pain was reduced through their active use of coping strategies. These findings support sociocognitive formulations of hypnotic responding that view ratings of involuntariness as reflecting contextually guided interpretations of behavior.
-
The seriously ill or terminally ill child with cancer has received inadequate pain control in the past, partly due to physicians' and nurses' fears and misconceptions regarding the administration of effective pain medications to a child. Advances in assessment techniques in the infant and young child, as well as increasing use of pain assessment questionnaires and VAS in the older child, have mandated changes in administration of analgesia to children. ⋯ The goal of therapy for the dying child is to maintain comfort and support the child and the family. Providing analgesia in the hospital or the home has proven safe and effective when administered either orally or parenterally, and comfort of the child is achieved.
-
Gynecologic oncology · Jan 1989
Percutaneous epidural catheterization for intractable pain in terminal cancer patients.
We examined the effects of long-term percutaneous epidural catheterization for pain relief in nine terminally ill gynecologic cancer patients. All patients were free of side-effects such as respiratory depression, nausea, vomiting, urinary retention, or pruritus. Analgesia was excellent in six patients. ⋯ Catheter dislodgement occurred in three patients. Although percutaneous epidural catheters were well tolerated in a few patients for an extended period of time, the frequency of catheter problems demonstrate that other methods such as catheter tunneling or implantable systems should be considered for long-term epidural administration of narcotics. This method appears to be most effective in patients suffering from pain due to nerve root involvement.
-
Acta Chir Scand Suppl · Jan 1989
ReviewThe stress response to surgery: release mechanisms and the modifying effect of pain relief.
This short review updates information on the release mechanisms of the systemic response to surgical injury and the modifying effect of pain relief. Initiation of the response is primarily due to afferent nerve impulses combined with release of humoral substances (such as prostaglandins, kinins, leukotrienes, interleukin-1, and tumor necrosis factor), while amplification factors include semi-starvation, infection, and hemorrhage. The relative role of the various signals in producing the complex injury response has not been finally determined, but the neural pathway is probably most important in releasing the classical endocrine catabolic response, while humoral factors are important for the hyperthermic response, changes in coagulation and fibrinolysis immunofunction, and capillary permeability. ⋯ Systemic opiate administration, as well as non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs, exert only a small modifying effect on the response. Low-dose combined analgesic regimens may provide total pain relief, but exert no important effect on the stress response. In summary, pain alleviation itself may not necessarily lead to an important modification of the stress response, and a combined approach with inhibition of the neural and humoral release mechanisms is necessary for a pronounced inhibition or prevention of the response to surgical injury.