Articles: back-pain.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of cognitive measures in low back pain: statistical structure and clinical validity at initial assessment.
Four cognitive measures--MHLC, PLC, CSQ and PRSS/PRCS--were directly compared in 120 U. K. patients with chronic low back pain. 80% of the individual items in the PLC and 86% in the CSQ had satisfactory test-retest reliability, as had most of the scales of the CSQ and the PLC PC scale. The items and the scales of the MHLC and the PRSS/PRCS had lower reliability. ⋯ There was also a relationship among cognitive measures and both disability and work loss which persisted even after controlling for severity of pain and depressive symptoms. The present results suggest that the concept of catastrophising has greatest potential for understanding current low back symptoms and that the CSQ may be the most useful measure of this. Other work, however, suggests that the PLC may also be of value in following change and predicting response to treatment.
-
This study investigated the psychometric properties of eight pain intensity measures used with chronic low back pain patients. All measures were similar in terms of scale distribution and rates of incorrect responses, with all scales apart from the Pain Rating Index significantly correlated. ⋯ The 101-point Numeric Rating Scale and the Box Scale had the strongest relationship, with loadings of 0.90. The Numeric Rating Scale and the Box Scale appear to be the scales of choice for the measurement of pain intensity in the low back pain patient.
-
A 30-year-old parturient requested epidural analgesia during labor. Immediately after the epidural space was presumably identified using the loss-of-resistance-to-air technique, she reported severe back pain, followed by neck pain, which progressed to severe unrelenting headache. An emergency computerized tomographic (CT) scan performed during labor showed air in the intracranial subarachnoid space.
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of eight psychometric instruments in unselected patients with back pain.
A comparative evaluation of eight psychometric instruments was made in 274 patients who were currently suffering or previously had suffered from low-back pain. The specificity and sensitivity values for detection of psychological disturbance were calculated and optimum cutoff scores determined for each test. The influence of current pain, social group, compensation, migrant status, and unemployment on the accuracy of each test were evaluated. ⋯ The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety Scale, the Hospital Depression Scale, and the Zung Depression Scale were the most accurate and least affected by the factors examined. The combination of the Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire and the Zung Depression Scale yielded specificities and sensitivities of 91% and 84% for men and 96% and 85% for women, respectively. This combination is recommended for the assessment of psychological disturbance in patients with low-back pain.
-
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol · Sep 1991
Correct placement of epidural steroid injections: fluoroscopic guidance and contrast administration.
We prospectively evaluated 316 caudal-approach epidural steroid injections given by staff radiologists and residents in our department over a 1-year period. Needle placement was checked with fluoroscopy and corrected if necessary. When the needle tip was within the sacral canal, nonionic contrast material was injected. ⋯ The presence of blood on the needle stylus was not a reliable indicator of venous placement of the needle. Our findings indicate that fluoroscopy is essential for correct placement of epidural steroid injection. Contrast administration is necessary to avoid venous injection of steroids.