Articles: low-back-pain.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of physician and nonphysician acupuncture treatment for chronic low back pain.
Although up to a third of the 10,000 acupuncturists in the United States are medical doctors, little is known about the acupuncture techniques they use or how their practices compare with those of nonphysician licensed acupuncturists. This is the first study providing descriptive data on physician acupuncture and comparison to nonphysician acupuncture. ⋯ This study provides new information about the nature of physician acupuncture practice in the United States and how it compares to acupuncture provided by nonphysician licensed acupuncturists. Further research is necessary to determine if the different types of acupuncture provided by physicians and nonphysician acupuncturists affect treatment outcomes and costs for patients with chronic low back pain.
-
Arch Phys Med Rehabil · Sep 2005
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialLumbar spine segmental mobility assessment: an examination of validity for determining intervention strategies in patients with low back pain.
To examine the predictive validity of posterior-anterior (PA) mobility testing in a group of patients with low back pain (LBP). ⋯ Patients with LBP judged to have lumbar hypomobility experienced greater benefit from an intervention including manipulation; those judged to have hypermobility were more likely to benefit from a stabilization exercise program.
-
Sacroiliac joint dysfunction is believed to be a significant source of low back and posterior pelvic pain. ⋯ A reliable examination technique to identify the sacroiliac joint as a source of low back pain seems to be pain relief following a radiologically guided injection of a local anaesthetic into the sacroiliac joint. Most patients respond to non-operative treatment. Patients who do not respond to non-operative treatment should be considered for operative sacroiliac joint stabilization.
-
Comparative Study
A longitudinal study on the predictive validity of the fear-avoidance model in low back pain.
Recently, fear-avoidance models have been quite influential in understanding the transition from acute to chronic low back pain (LBP). Not only has pain-related fear been found to be associated with disability and increased pain severity, but also treatment focused at reducing pain-related fear has shown to successfully reduce disability levels. In spite of these developments, there is still a lack in well-designed prospective studies examining the role of pain-related fear in acute back pain. ⋯ A backward ordinal regression analysis showed previous LBP history and pain intensity to be the most important predictors of end of study GCPS. Of the fear-avoidance model variables, only negative affect added to this model. Our results do not really support the longitudinal validity of the fear-avoidance model, but they do feed the discussion on the role of pain-related fear in early stages of LBP.
-
J Manipulative Physiol Ther · Sep 2005
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyA randomized clinical trial of manual versus mechanical force manipulation in the treatment of sacroiliac joint syndrome.
To investigate the effect of instrument-delivered compared with traditional manual-delivered thrust chiropractic adjustments in the treatment of sacroiliac joint syndrome. ⋯ The results indicate that a short regimen of either mechanical-force, manually-assisted or high-velocity, low-amplitude chiropractic adjustments were associated with a beneficial effect of a reduction in pain and disability in patients diagnosed with sacroiliac joint syndrome. Neither mechanical-force, manually-assisted nor high-velocity, low-amplitude adjustments were found to be more effective than the other in the treatment of this patient population.