Articles: pain-management-methods.
-
Successful management of chronic cancer and nonmalignant pain remains a challenge to clinicians, and cost effectiveness is an important consideration for clinical decision making. Although the oral route was previously considered the optimal method of chronic opioid administration, emerging evidence demonstrates a therapeutic advantage to intrathecal opioid delivery compared to alternative modalities. ⋯ Although the initial costs of surgical implantation of an intrathecal pump appear to be substantial, maintenance costs of intrathecal drug delivery over time are significantly lower than other routes of administration, including oral and intravenous drug delivery. Cost analyses of alternate routes of opioid administration indicate that intrathecal delivery is the most cost-effective route of opioid administration for patients who require long-term management of cancer (≥ 3-6 months) or nonmalignant pain (≥ 11-22 months).
-
Introduction. Interventional modalities for pain treatment are reserved for patients failing multidisciplinary pain management, including psychological, physical, pharmacological, and anesthetic techniques. Objective. ⋯ Conclusion. SCS was safe for implantation in our case study of a pregnant woman. This may constitute a new indication for SCS in patients otherwise successfully managed with non-interventional modalities for pain control.
-
Objectives. Recent technical improvements in implanted stimulation devices, in particular the development of programmable, multicontact devices, have facilitated their clinical application in the management of pain. If the capabilities of these devices are to be used to full advantage, adjustment after implantation demands a major investment of time and effort. ⋯ Results and Conclusions. Our patient-interactive computerized system has proven to be safe and effective clinically in adjusting implanted spinal cord stimulators. It offers advantages of data standardization and quality control, as well as delivery of novel pulse sequences and protocols to assess the treatment of pain and neurological disorders by electrical stimulation devices.
-
Objective. To test the following hypotheses, based on computer modeling studies of spinal cord stimulation, by the analysis of data from chronic pain patients: I. the probability-of-paresthesia in a dermatome is highest when the cathode is placed at the corresponding segmental level; II. variation of the rostrocaudal position of the cathode in the lower cervical/high thoracic region results in less variation of the probability-of-paresthesia in a dermatome than stimulation in more caudal regions; III. when stimulating in the midthoracic region, the probability-of-paresthesia in a dermatome is low in comparison to other regions when the cathode is not at the corresponding segmental level. Method. ⋯ Conclusion. The success to be expected from spinal cord stimulation in chronic pain management is inversely related to the thickness of the dorsal cerebrospinal fluid layer at the cathode level. Therefore, preoperative measurement from transverse images can be helpful as a predictor for success.
-
Study Design. This is a prospective study designed to identify psychological factors associated with response to spinal cord stimulation (SCS) trial. Summary of Background Data. ⋯ Conclusions. Patient mood state is an important predictor of trial outcome. Specific indicators of SCS trial outcome are the MMPI depression and mania subscale scores with successful trials being associated with individuals who are less depressed and have higher energy levels.