Articles: pain-measurement.
-
Documented assessment of pain does increase patient satisfaction in pain control and treatment but it must be carried out regularly and, more importantly, it must be acted upon. Patients who participate in documented assessment of pain postoperatively may find it easier to communicate their pain levels to the nurse, may feel more informed about their treatment and may be given analgesia more quickly than a control group. Nurses are aware of the importance of pain intensity assessment but do not always assess the effectiveness of the analgesia given. ⋯ Pain cannot be treated or controlled if it is not accurately assessed. Any information given before surgery decreases anxiety levels and therefore lessens the patient's perception of pain postoperatively, particularly when the information is related to how and where the patient may feel pain. The use of documented pain assessment combined with patient-controlled analgesia systems may be the key to effective postoperative pain control.
-
A consecutive sample of 53 chronic cancer pain patients were administered 5 different pain intensity scales: a visual analogue scale (VAS), a numerical rating scale from 0 to 10 (NRS), a verbal rating scale (VRS), the Italian Pain Questionnaire (Italian version of the McGill Pain Questionnaire) (PRI), and the Integrated Pain Score (IPS) which is an instrument designed at the Pain Therapy and Palliative Care Division of the National Cancer Institute of Milan to integrate pain intensity and duration in a single measure. These scales were administered before and after a definite therapy change. ⋯ A single factor clearly emerged explaining most of the different scales variability. A logistic regression analysis showed that VAS, NRS, VRS were more strongly associated with IRS than PRI and IPS.
-
A bedside technique for evaluating the behavioural response of healthy neonates to pain was assessed. Thirty six term infants (median gestational age 40 weeks; median postnatal age 4 days) and 31 preterm infants (median gestational age 34 weeks; median postnatal age 4 days) were assessed at the cotside for their response to heel preparation and heel lance for routine blood sampling. The facial actions of brow bulge, eye squeeze, nasolabial furrow, and open mouth were noted, and also the presence or absence of crying. ⋯ Brow bulge and nasolabial furrow were seen most often, and occurred more often than crying in the two groups. There was good interobserver agreement (94%). The consistency of response and the high degree of interobserver agreement makes this method of behavioural assessment of acute pain of use in healthy neonates.
-
J Pediatr Oncol Nurs · Apr 1994
Comparative StudyMeasuring pain in pediatric oncology ICU patients.
Thirty patients (ages 5 to 13) hospitalized in a pediatric oncology intensive care unit (ICU) rated the presence and severity of their pain on the Faces Pain Scale (FPS) and the Poker Chip Tool (PCT). Parents independently rated the child's pain on these scales and each patient's nurse completed the Objective Pain Scale (OPS). ⋯ The majority of patients, parents, and nurses expressed a preference for the FPS over the PCT. The FPS appears to be a clinically useful and accurate approach for measuring the pain of pediatric oncology patients in an ICU but is limited to those who can participate in a self-report measurement.
-
Although a number of self-report indices that measure intensity and psychosocial components of the pain experience are available, these measures do not assess the range of cognitive, behavioral, and physiological reactions frequently associated with pain. This paper describes the initial determination of the psychometric properties of the Biobehavioral Pain Profile (BPP) developed to measure these reactions. The BPP is a 41-item self-report scale tested in a sample of 617 subjects with chronic recurrent pain, chronic non-malignant pain or chronic malignant pain. ⋯ Test-retest reliability for the scales ranged from 0.57 to 0.73. Low correlations among the BPP and general indices of fear, depression, anxiety, body consciousness and social desirability are reported. The BPP appears to provide a unique composite assessment of self-report of behavioral, physiological, and cognitive reactions to pain experienced by individuals with a wide range of pain problems.