Articles: nerve-block.
-
To demonstrate the effectiveness of Sarapin in prolonging the action of neural blockade with improved pain relief. ⋯ This prospective, double-blind trial of 500 patients undergoing 828 treatments, one time with Sarapin and a subsequent time without, with each patient acting as their own control, showed no significant differences in the pain relief or duration of significant relief with the addition of Sarapin.
-
Reg Anesth Pain Med · Jan 2004
Case ReportsAccidental subdural injection during attempted lumbar epidural block may present as a failed or inadequate block: radiographic evidence.
Until now, case reports after accidental subdural injection during attempted epidural block have usually described extensive neuraxial blocks with a delayed onset, after low doses of local anesthetic, with a characteristic radiographic appearance on contrast injection. Our radiographic investigation of atypical "epidural" blocks has revealed that subdural injection may go unrecognized clinically and may be a cause of inadequate blocks. The mechanism is explored. ⋯ Accidental subdural injection may now be added to the list of causes of failed or inadequate "epidural" block. Clinicians should be aware of the diagnosis of a possible subdural injection, if a poor quality block with restricted spread and slow onset is associated with pain on postoperative reinjection of the catheter.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
[Intercostal nerve blockade with alcohol during operation for postthoracotomy pain].
Purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of intraoperative intercostal nerve blockade with alcohol in addition to epidural analgesia with morphine for control of postthoracotomy pain syndrome. ⋯ Additional intraoperative intercostal nerve blockade with alcohol provides an additional benefit for postthoracotomy pain relief, especially for at least one month following the thoracotomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jan 2004
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of three different approaches on the onset time of sciatic nerve blocks with 0.75% ropivacaine.
We studied three different injection techniques of sciatic nerve block in terms of block onset time and efficacy with 0.75% ropivacaine. A total of 75 patients undergoing foot surgery were randomly allocated to receive sciatic nerve blockade by means of the classic posterior approach (group classic; n = 25), a modified subgluteus posterior approach (group subgluteus; n = 25), or a lateral popliteal approach (group popliteal; n = 25). All blocks were performed with the use of a nerve stimulator (stimulation frequency, 2 Hz; intensity, 2-0.5 mA) and 30 mL of 0.75% ropivacaine. Onset of nerve block was defined as complete loss of pinprick sensation in the sciatic nerve distribution with concomitant inability to perform plantar or dorsal flexion of the foot. In the three groups, an appropriate sciatic stimulation was elicited at <0.5 mA. The failure rate was similar in the three groups (group popliteal: 4% versus group classic: 4% versus group subgluteus: 8%). The onset of nerve block was slower in group popliteal (25 +/- 5 min) compared with group classic (16 +/- 4 min) and group subgluteus (17 +/- 4 min; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in the onset of nerve block between group classic and group subgluteus. No differences in the degree of pain measured at the first postoperative administration of pain medication were observed among the three groups. We conclude that the three approaches resulted in clinically acceptable anesthesia in the distribution of the sciatic nerve. The subgluteus and classic posterior approaches generated a significantly faster onset of anesthesia than the lateral popliteal approach. ⋯ Comparing three different approaches to the sciatic nerve with 0.75% ropivacaine, the classic and subgluteal approaches exhibited a faster onset time of sensory and motor blockade than the lateral popliteal approach.