Articles: nerve-block.
-
Case Reports Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Comparison of the effectiveness of bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block and wound infiltration for postoperative analgesia after caesarean section.
We have studied the effects of bilateral ilioinguinal nerve block and wound infiltration with 0.5% bupivacaine on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in 62 patients undergoing Caesarean section under general anaesthesia. A control group received no local anaesthetic supplementation. Both ilioinguinal block and wound infiltration reduced significantly the pain scores and analgesic requirements in the immediate postoperative period (P < 0.05). The differences in pain scores and analgesic requirements between the study groups were not statistically significant (P > 0.05).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1994
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialDose-response relationships for edrophonium and neostigmine antagonism of pipecuronium-induced neuromuscular block.
We have studied the dose-response relationships for neostigmine and edrophonium during antagonism of neuromuscular block induced by pipecuronium bromide. Fifty-six ASA physical status I or II adults were given pipecuronium 70 micrograms/kg during fentanylthiopental-nitrous oxide-halothane anesthesia. Train-of-four (TOF) stimulation was applied to the ulnar nerve every 10 s, and the force of contraction of the adductor pollicis muscle was recorded. ⋯ Corresponding ED50 and ED80 values for endrophonium were 84.1 (72.9-96.9) and 233 (215.7-253.3) microgram/kg, respectively. These values corresponded to neostigmine:edrophonium potency ratios of 9.89 (7.4-12.3) and 13.4 (11.8-14.9) for first twitch ED50 and ED80 height, respectively. The calculated doses producing 50% (ED50) recovery of the TOF ratio at 10 min were 18.8 (17.5-20.2) and 271.3 (246.5-298.6) microgram/kg for neostigmine and edrophonium, respectively.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd · Feb 1994
Review Comparative Study[Peribulbar anesthesia versus retrobulbar anesthesia with facial nerve block. Techniques, local anesthetics and additives, akinesia and sensory block, complications].
Retrobulbar anesthesia (RETRO), combined with a facial block, is the most frequently employed method of anesthesia in cataract surgery. There is, however, an increasing tendency to use peribulbar anesthesia (PERI), which is claimed to provide the same degree of anesthesia and akinesia as RETRO while reducing many of the complications. ⋯ In randomized order, 160 cataract patients received PERI (technique with 2 injections) with 6, 8 or 10 ml of a bupivacaine-lidocaine-hyaluronidase mixture (without facial block) or RETRO (Unsöld technique) with 5 ml of the above mixture, combined with a Nadbath/Rehman facial nerve block (5 ml etidocaine-lidocaine mixture). Measured 20 min after injection (intervening period of oculopression), the smallest ocular motility (Kestenbaum limbus test) was left after RETRO. After administration of PERI - even with a volume of 10 ml - the range of residual ocular motility was always higher, i.e., there was a less reliable globe akinesia than after RETRO. The lid closure force (Straub technique) averaged zero after all methods of anesthesia; however, the smallest spread (highest reliability) was observed after PERI. Complete corneal anesthesia (Draeger esthesiometer) was found in nearly all cases, i.e., RETRO and PERI are comparably effective concerning sensory blockade...