Articles: hyperalgesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Effects of Milnacipran on Clinical Pain and Hyperalgesia of Patients With Fibromyalgia: Results of a 6-Week Randomized Controlled Trial.
Milnacipran is a serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor that was approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as effective therapy for fibromyalgia (FM) symptoms. However, its analgesic mechanism of action is not well understood. We hypothesized that improvement of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia would be a critical component of overall milnacipran efficacy in FM. We used a novel quantitative sensory testing protocol for assessment of mechanical and heat pain sensitivity that can be used for testing of peripheral and central pain mechanisms and their impact on clinical pain over time. We applied tonic mechanical and heat pain stimuli to 46 patients with FM during a randomized controlled trial with either 50 mg milnacipran (n = 23) or placebo (n = 23) twice daily over 6 weeks. During this trial, mean clinical pain (standard deviation) was evaluated daily, and mechanical and heat pain sensitivity every 2 weeks. At study entry, clinical pain was 5.0 (1.8) and 5.5 (1.8) visual analog scale units for patients with FM randomized to placebo and milnacipran, respectively (P > .05). Over 6 weeks, clinical pain of patients with FM significantly declined by 15%, but this improvement was not statistically different between milnacipran and placebo. However, repeated measures of mechanical and heat pain sensitivity reliably predicted up to 80% of the variance in clinical FM pain at every time point. Clinical pain and mechanical/heat pain sensitivity of patients with FM steadily declined during this trial, but the effects of milnacipran were not found to be superior to placebo. Repeated measures of mechanical/heat hyperalgesia reliably predicted large amounts of the variance in clinical pain across all participants, indicating their relevance for FM pain. ⋯ Although clinical pain and hyperalgesia decreased during this 6-week trial, the efficacy of milnacipran was not superior to placebo. The high correlations between clinical pain and hyperalgesia ratings at every time point seem to emphasize the relevant contributions of mechanical and heat hyperalgesia to clinical FM pain.
-
Quantitative sensory testing is widely used in human research to investigate the state of the peripheral and central nervous system contributions in pain processing. It is a valuable tool to help identify central sensitization and may be important in the treatment of low back pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate changes in local and segmental hypersensitivity and endogenous pain inhibition in people with chronic nonspecific low back pain. ⋯ During CPM, people with chronic low back pain have significantly lower PPT than controls in lumbar region [118.6 kPa (mean difference) 95 % CI 77.9-159.2 kPa]. Women had significantly lower PPTs than men in both lumbar region [101.7 kPa (mean difference) 95 % CI 37.9-165.7 kPa] and over the TA [189.7 kPa (mean difference) 95 % CI 14.2-145.2 kPa]. There was no significant difference in PPTs in men between healthy controls and those with low back pain, suggesting the significant differences are mediated primarily by difference between women.
-
Habituation and sensitization are important features of individual sensitivity to repetitive noxious stimulation and have been investigated in numerous studies. However, it is unclear whether these phenomena vary depending on the site of stimulation. Here we compared short-term and long-term effects of painful heat stimulation on the forehead and limb using an established longitudinal heat pain paradigm performed over 8 consecutive days in 36 healthy volunteers. Participants were randomized into 2 groups; participants received repetitive heat pain stimulation either on the left volar forearm or on the left side of the forehead. Our data show a comparable degree of habituation over the course of 8 days in both groups. However, participants in the trigeminal stimulation group exhibited stronger within-session sensitization (indexed by a higher within-session increase in pain intensity ratings) than those who received the forearm stimulation. Furthermore, over the course of the experiment we found a correlation between habituation and anxiety, showing less habituation in participants with higher trait anxiety scores. Our findings are in line with somatotopic differences in response to painful stimulation and a higher proneness of trigeminal pain to sensitization processes, which might be explained by the biological relevance of the head and facial area for vital functions. The contribution of this sensitivity to the development and maintenance of clinical facial pain and headache disorders warrants further investigation. ⋯ This study uses psychophysical methods to evaluate the differences in long-term habituation and short-term sensitization to heat pain between the trigeminal and spinal systems. We found stronger sensitization for trigeminal compared with nociceptive stimuli on the forearm. The contribution of this sensitivity to clinical pain states warrants further investigation.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Comparison of nerve growth factor-induced sensitization pattern in lumbar and tibial muscle and fascia.
Nerve growth factor (NGF) induces profound hyperalgesia. In this study we explored patterns of NGF sensitization in muscle and fascia of distal and paraspinal sites. ⋯ Spatial mechanical sensitization differs between muscle and fascia. Thoracolumbar fasciae appear more sensitive than tibial fasciae and may be major contributors to low back pain, but the temporal sensitization profile is similar between paraspinal and distal sites. Muscle Nerve 52: 265-272, 2015.
-
Although high levels of negative affect and cognitions have been associated with greater pain sensitivity in chronic pain conditions, the neural mechanisms mediating the hyperalgesic effect of psychological factors in patients with pain disorders are largely unknown. In this cross-sectional study, we hypothesized that 1) catastrophizing modulates brain responses to pain anticipation and 2) anticipatory brain activity mediates the hyperalgesic effect of different levels of catastrophizing in fibromyalgia (FM) patients. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we scanned the brains of 31 FM patients exposed to visual cues anticipating the onset of moderately intense deep-tissue pain stimuli. Our results indicated the existence of a negative association between catastrophizing and pain-anticipatory brain activity, including in the right lateral prefrontal cortex. A bootstrapped mediation analysis revealed that pain-anticipatory activity in the lateral prefrontal cortex mediates the association between catastrophizing and pain sensitivity. These findings highlight the role of the lateral prefrontal cortex in the pathophysiology of FM-related hyperalgesia and suggest that deficits in the recruitment of pain-inhibitory brain circuitry during pain-anticipatory periods may play an important contributory role in the association between various degrees of widespread hyperalgesia in FM and levels of catastrophizing, a well-validated measure of negative cognitions and psychological distress. ⋯ This article highlights the presence of alterations in pain-anticipatory brain activity in FM. These findings provide the rationale for the development of psychological or neurofeedback-based techniques aimed at modifying patients' negative affect and cognitions toward pain.