Articles: intensive-care-units.
-
The feasibility, safety and clinical impact of transesophageal echocardiography were evaluated in 51 critically ill intensive care unit patients (28 men and 23 women; mean age 63 years) in whom transthoracic echocardiography was inadequate. At the time of transesophageal echocardiography, 30 patients (59%) were being mechanically ventilated. Transesophageal echocardiography was performed without significant complications in 49 patients (96%), and 2 patients with heart failure had worsening of hemodynamic and respiratory difficulties after insertion of the transesophageal probe. ⋯ In the remaining patients, transesophageal echocardiography permitted confident exclusion of suspected abnormalities because of its superior imaging qualities. Cardiac surgery was prompted by transesophageal echocardiographic findings in 12 patients (24%) and these findings were confirmed at operation in all. Therefore, transesophageal echocardiography can be safely performed and has a definite role in the diagnosis and expeditious management of critically ill cardiovascular patients.
-
Critical care medicine · Dec 1990
Femoral artery cannulation for monitoring in critically ill children: prospective study.
Seventy-seven attempted percutaneous femoral artery cannulations were prospectively evaluated in 74 children. Artery cannulation was successfully accomplished in 73 (95%) cases and lasted for a mean of 6 days. Sixty percent of the catheters were inserted on the first attempt. ⋯ The development of this complication correlated significantly (p less than .05) with younger age (5.5 vs. 22.3 months). We conclude that femoral artery cannulation has a high degree of success in very small, critically ill children. It should be considered an acceptable alternative to small-vessel cannulation when the latter is not technically achievable, or in the unstable patient where rapid establishment of reliable arterial access is necessary.
-
Thirty patients who had undergone elective anterolateral thoracotomy were studied in the surgical intensive care unit to compare the analgesic effectiveness of i.v. self-administered buprenorphine (group A) with that of epidural administration (group B) and of s.c. administration by a nurse of 0.3 mg buprenorphine every 3-4 h (group C, controls). Every 2 h the patients were asked to record their subjektive pain level as a percentage on an analogue scale: zero was to be used for no pain and 100% for the most severe pain they could imagine. the mean of all analogue scores for pain in the first 36 h was 19.4+/-3.1 for group A; 18.4+/-2.3 for group B and 42.0+/-7.4 for group C (P<0.025). When the mean scores were referred to time, it seemed that groups A and B suffered a little more pain immediately after the operation; however, after 4 h the mean scores for these groups were far lower than that for the control group. ⋯ Nurses should be instructed to provide analgesic medication on demand. Epidural administration of buprenorphine is superior to self-administration in terms of the amount of drugs used and the dosing intervals. In the quality of analgesia epidural administration and self-administration are equal and superior to the control procedure.