Articles: sepsis.
-
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand · Nov 2024
ReviewExploring heterogeneity of treatment effect in patients with sepsis: Protocol for a scoping review.
The average treatment effect (ATE) reported by most randomised clinical trials provides estimates of treatment effects for the theoretical, non-existent average patient. However, ATE may not accurately reflect the outcomes for all subsets of the trial population; some individuals may benefit from the intervention, while others experience worse outcomes or no effect at all. Heterogeneity of treatment effect (HTE) is the non-random and explainable variation in the magnitude or direction of a treatment effect among individuals within a population. Predictive approaches to HTE seek to provide estimates of which treatment of choice is better suited for the individual patient, using regression and/or machine learning techniques. This scoping review aims to investigate the extent to which such predictive approaches to HTE are applied to data from trials on sepsis or septic shock as well as the results of these analyses. ⋯ The planned scoping review will systematically investigate, summarise and delineate the existing evidence of analysis of HTE in trials on sepsis or septic shock patients as well as their findings, when performed using predictive approaches.
-
When comparing outcomes after sepsis, it is essential to account for patient case mix to make fair comparisons. We developed a model to assess risk-adjusted 30-day mortality in the Michigan Hospital Medicine Safety sepsis initiative (HMS-Sepsis). ⋯ The HMS-Sepsis mortality model showed strong discrimination and adequate calibration and reclassified one-third of hospitals to a different performance category from unadjusted mortality. Based on its strong performance, the HMS-Sepsis mortality model may aid in fair hospital benchmarking, assessment of temporal changes, and observational causal inference analysis.
-
Objective : Vascular endothelial cells (ECs) sense and respond to both trauma factors (histone proteins) and sepsis signals (bacterial lipopolysaccharide, LPS) with elevations in calcium (Ca 2+ ), but it is not clear if the patterns of activation are similar or different. We hypothesized that within seconds of exposure, histones but not LPS would produce a large EC Ca 2+ response. We also hypothesized that histones would produce different spatio-temporal patterns of Ca 2+ events in veins than in arteries. ⋯ Exposure of ECs to histones or LPS both increased gene expression, but different mRNAs were induced. Conclusions : LPS and histones activate ECs through mechanisms that are distinct and additive; only histones produce large aberrant Ca 2+ events. ECs in arteries and veins display different patterns of Ca 2+ responses to histones.