Articles: postoperative.
-
In a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study, 86 patients (44 verum, 42 placebo), scheduled for knee-joint arthrotomies or minor orthopaedic operations received either naproxen, a nonsteroidal antiinflammatory analgesic, or placebo orally in three doses: the first immediately before the operation and the others 6 h and 12 h after the first. The verum group received 1250 mg naproxen in total. Postoperative pain intensity was measured by the category splitting procedure. ⋯ The intensity of typical side effects of opioids and antipyretic anti-inflammatory analgesics (nausea, vomiting, stomachache, headache, vertigo) was low and they were easily controlled in all cases. Lowering of respiratory frequency was not observed. Perioperative administration of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory analgesic naproxen results in better pain relief and significantly lower opioid requirements (by about 46%) after minor orthopaedic surgery.
-
Journal of anesthesia · Jul 1993
Differences in the assessment of postoperative pain when evaluated by patients and doctors.
This study was undertaken to compare the assessment of pain intensity by 59 patients and by their doctors according to a visual analogue scale (VAS) at rest and when coughing at 5 and 20 hr after major abdominal surgery. The rating given by the patients, who received epidural analgesia to relieve postoperative pain, was significantly above, and moreover, significantly correlated with that given by the doctors at any time or under any condition of the assessment. ⋯ Our findings indicate that the assessment of postoperative pain may be associated with some unreliability, especially during early periods, when using the subjective or objective-rated VAS at rest separately, and thus requires the combined use or the concomitant use of the VAS when coughing. Substitutional use of the objective-rated VAS for the subjective-rated VAS is not advised.
-
Postoperative pain can intensify the sympathoadrenergic reaction, which is commonly seen after surgery, and thus possibly pave the way for certain complications, such as coronary ischemia, bronchopneumonia, intestinal stasis, thromboembolism, infection, sepsis, and metabolic disturbances. Investigations of cardiovascular, respiratory, gastrointestinal, metabolic, and immunologic function indicate that high-quality pain relief can diminish postoperative organ impairment and failure. Some aspects of the improvements attributed to the quality of analgesia, such as prevention of tachycardia and hypertension, attenuation of hyperglycemia and catabolism, improvement of gastrointestinal motility and cellular immunity cannot be definitely distinguished from the effects of sympathetic blockade due to epidural analgesia with local anesthetics, however. ⋯ Some studies indicate that better analgesia is advantageous for the patient, especially with respect to postoperative complications, hospital stay, long-term well being, and costs. In other clinical trials incorporating more patients, however, this hypothesis had to be rejected. At present, therefore, we cannot state that effective pain relief influences postoperative morbidity and mortality.
-
At present, intramuscular application of opioids given on request is the most widespread form of postoperative analgesia. This method is widely recognized as often being inadequate, however. As advanced techniques of pain management, such as patient-controlled analgesia, are not generally available, the question arises as to whether non-opioid analgesics should routinely be used in order to improve this situation. ⋯ Despite these results, it must be borne in mind that most studies have been carried out on patients of ASA groups I and II and that conclusions drawn from the literature are not necessarily representative for the elderly and for patients with organ failure. Alternative substances have received relatively little attention. Of these, the pyrazolone derivative, metamizol, may well prove to be of value for patients in whom the use of NSAIDS is contraindicated or relatively ineffective such as after biliary tract surgery.
-
Many studies investigated patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) in the postoperative period in recovery rooms under anaesthesiologic monitoring but reports on the advantages and indications of PCA in surgical wards are scarce. The aim of this prospective study therefore was to investigate PCA as a routine technique in surgical wards. In particular we were interested in safety and in the efficacy of analgesia. ⋯ We conclude that PCA with piritramide is a safe technique when performed under routine conditions on surgical wards. However, standardized monitoring is mandatory. PCA leads to effective analgesia and consequently to greater comfort of surgical patients in the postoperative period. These conclusions hold only for patients with ASA status I-II who have undergone operations of the types listed above.