Articles: cations.
-
Recent reports of provocative discography not only instill confusion, but also create numerous questions about its value in evaluating low back pain. It was reported that provocative discography produced pain in patients who were not suffering with low back pain but suffering with somatization disorder and depression. This study was designed to evaluate 50 randomly assigned patients, with 25 patients in Group I without somatization disorder and 25 patients in Group II with diagnosis of somatization disorder. ⋯ Any other response, with or without pain, was considered negative. Results showed positive provocative discography in 46% of the patients in the somatization group compared to 54% in the non-somatization group; in 46% of patients with depression compared to 54% of patients without depression; in 15 of 30 patients with generalized anxiety disorder; in 11 of 20 patients without generalized anxiety disorder; and in 42% of patients with combined somatization and depression, with negative discography in 58% of the patients. It is concluded that provocative discography provides similar results in patients with or without somatization, with or without depression, with somatization but with or without depression or with other combinations of the psychological triad of somatization disorder, depression, and generalized anxiety disorder.
-
Chronic low back pain and obesity are two common medical conditions. Obesity has been associated with symptoms such as adverse fat distribution and multiple secondary disorders, including low back pain. Obesity is defined as being 30% over ideal weight, which influences normal body mechanics as well as recovery from an injury. ⋯ The results showed that the prevalence rate of facet joint pain in chronic low back pain in Group I or nonobese patients was 36%, in contrast to 40% in Group II, or the obese patient group, with no significant differences among the two groups. The study also showed a false-positive rate of 39% in the total sample, or 44% in Group I nonobese patients and 33% in Group II, or obese patients. It is concluded that the prevalence of lumbar facet joint mediated pain of 40% in obese patients and 36% in patients of normal weight with a false-positive rate of 33% in obese patients and 44% in nonobese patients is similar to the results of multiple previous studies concluding that facet joint mediated pain is a common occurrence in obese patients; however, the incidence of facet joint mediated pain is similar in obese patients and nonobese patients.
-
Spinal endoscopy with epidural adhesiolysis is an interventional pain management technique which emerged during the 1990s. It is an invasive but important treatment modality in managing chronic low back pain that is nonresponsive to other modalities of treatment, including percutaneous spring guided adhesiolysis and transforaminal epidural injections. ⋯ Percutaneous endoscopic lysis of epidural scar tissue has been shown to be cost effective and a safe modality. This review discusses various aspects of endoscopic adhesiolysis, including clinical effectiveness, complications, rationale, and indications.
-
Biochemical mechanisms to explain pain generation began relatively recently. Evaluating pain originating from the spine can be challenging because no historical or physical examination findings are sufficiently sensitive or specific for identifying each of the myriad of potential pain generators. These discrete anatomic structures include the nerve root, disc annulus, posterior longitudinal ligament, sacroiliac joint, and facet joint. ⋯ However, this test may not be necessary in the patient when the specific radiculopathy level diagnosis is apparent; this is the case when a characteristic history and physical examination have a corroborative single-level imaging lesion. Determining which level is generating symptoms has implications for subsequent physical therapy, therapeutic injections, and surgery. This review of selective nerve root blocks describes the relevant anatomy, pathophysiology, rationale, clinical utility, and complications.
-
Early reports of late outcomes among survivors of ARDS indicated that most patients improved dramatically after their intensive care unit stay, and few lived with residua of their once-severe pulmonary injury. Over the last decade, a collection of new studies with improved methodology and novel questions has improved our understanding of life after ARDS. After reviewing these newer investigations in the context of previously published literature, we have drawn several preliminary conclusions: (1) Long-term survival after hospital discharge is unaffected by ARDS, but is strongly affected by ARDS risk factor and comorbidities. (2) Respiratory symptoms after ARDS are more prevalent than previously indicated, but improve over the first 12 months of recovery. (3) Pulmonary function testing reveals marked impairment soon after ARDS. ⋯ A small group of patients have severe impairment without improvement. (4) Quality of life, functional independence, and cognitive function are severely affected by ARDS, with dramatic improvement over the first year. Quality of life is lower than in matched critically ill controls. (5) Significant numbers of ARDS survivors suffer from posttraumatic stress syndrome. This is an exciting time for research in long-term outcomes of ARDS, with potential for future studies that validate these single-center hypotheses, explore their ramifications, and investigate the impacts of changing practices in the intensive care unit in the acute phase of ARDS.