Articles: emergency-medicine.
-
We sought to describe the spectrum of illness and number of patients seen by pediatric residents rotating through a pediatric ED. ⋯ The number and type of patients seen by individual residents in this study showed significant variation. Many illnesses were not seen frequently enough for every resident to develop competence solely on the basis of clinical experience during ED rotations. A computerized, easily accessible ED database can be used to track the experience of individual residents or groups of residents. Such tracking would allow residents and program directors to identify areas that may require alternate educational strategies and would also document the residents' experience for future credentialing.
-
Currently, there are no data that govern the number of procedures that are necessary to promote competence during emergency medicine (EM) training. Nonetheless, the Residency Review Committee requires each program to report the average number of procedures and resuscitations performed by its residents. For 7 years, we have used a computer database to track resuscitation and procedure experience for 42 residents. ⋯ There is no documentation that some residents perform even one of some rare but critical procedures. This tracking system suggests, then, that procedure simulations, or cadaver and animal models, must be developed and used to enhance experience. This program can be modified to track resident experience in any specialty, as well as to document supervision by faculty and support credentialling inquiries.
-
Comparative Study
Evidence of methodologic bias in the derivation of the Science Citation Index impact factor.
The "impact factor" published in Science Citation Index (SCI) is widely used in the scientific community to measure the relative importance of a medical journal. In contrast to all other indicators of academic growth in emergency medicine, impact factors for emergency medicine journals have remained low and unchanged since the inception of the specialty. We wished to investigate this incongruity. ⋯ The apparent failure of emergency medicine journals, as measured by the SCI impact factor, to keep pace with other indicators of academic development of the field is at least in part attributable to a methodologic bias inherent in the derivation of this factor.