Articles: emergency-services.
-
This study determined the relationship between the emergency nurse work environment and emergency department patient left without being seen rates and lengths of stay. ⋯ Hospital administrators should consider investing in nurse work environments as a foundation to improve timely outcomes.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Sep 2024
Improving Goal-Concordant Care in Intensive Care Unit Admissions from the Emergency Department in a Comprehensive Cancer Center.
As patients approach the end of life, discussion of their treatment goals is essential to avoid unnecessary suffering and deliver care in a manner consistent with their overall values. ⋯ Through our multipronged approach, we significantly improved the rates of ACP documentation among providers admitting patients from the ED to the ICU.
-
Pediatric emergency care · Sep 2024
Sedoanalgesia With Ketamine in the Emergency Department: Factors Associated With Unsatisfactory Effectiveness.
Ketamine is a safe and widely used sedative and analgesic in children. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the response to sedoanalgesia for painful procedures in the pediatric emergency department. ⋯ This study concludes that intravenous/intranasal ketamine can provide safe and successful analgesia in pediatric patients in the ED. At intravenous doses of 1-1.5 mg/kg, good effectiveness was achieved in almost 90% of cases. Arthrocentesis had the highest percentage of unsatisfactory results. Repeat dosing should be considered for procedures longer than 20 minutes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Pragmatic Clinical Trial
Cost-Effectiveness of HIV Screening in Emergency Departments: Results From the Pragmatic Randomized HIV Testing Using Enhanced Screening Techniques in Emergency Departments Trial.
Identification of HIV remains a critical health priority for which emergency departments (EDs) are a central focus. The comparative cost-effectiveness of various HIV screening strategies in EDs remains largely unknown. The goal of this study was to compare programmatic costs and cost-effectiveness of nontargeted and 2 forms of targeted opt-out HIV screening in EDs using results from a multicenter, pragmatic randomized clinical trial. ⋯ Nontargeted HIV screening was more costly than targeted screening largely due to an increased number of HIV tests performed. Each HIV screening strategy had similar within-strategy costs per new HIV diagnosis with traditional targeted screening yielding the lowest cost per new diagnosis. For settings with budget constraints or very low HIV prevalences, the traditional targeted approach may be preferred; however, given only a slightly higher cost per new HIV diagnosis, ED settings looking to detect the most new cases may prefer nontargeted screening.