Articles: pain-management.
-
According to WHO guidelines, morphine is the first choice for the treatment of chronic cancer pain, preferably as a controlled-release preparation administered orally. The WHO classifies the quality of pain management of a particular country by its morphine consumption for medical reasons. For this article, data from clinical and market research were collected. ⋯ The report also focuses on physicians' subjective viewpoints and prejudices. When strong opioids are only rarely prescribed, a general practitioner then has difficulties in assessing pain and possible side effects and treatment evaluation. Clinical research, too, is hampered by special regulations concerning controlled opioid administration.
-
Pain treatment is a crucial aspect in the care of children with cancer and there are many studies demonstrating inefficient pain treatment. In this study, questionnaires dealing with pain treatment of children with malignant diseases were sent to all (47) pediatric departments in Sweden. The aims of this nationwide survey were to evaluate the extent and causes of pain, the use of methods for pain evaluation (e.g. analysis of type of pain and monitoring of pain intensity), principles of pain management, side effects of pain treatment and the educational needs of physicians and nurses regarding these issues. ⋯ According to a majority of physicians and nurses (72%), pain could be treated more effectively than it is presently, and 64% state that they need more time for the management of pain. Both physicians and nurses state that they need additional education in different areas of pain evaluation and pain treatment. Swedish treatment practices for the management of pediatric cancer pain roughly follow the published guidelines, but many improvements are still necessary.
-
The problem of pain following spinal cord injury challenges the health care community to develop new treatment strategies for patients requiring pain management. A number of pain syndromes are associated with spinal injury based on the nature of the lesion, neurological structures damaged, and secondary pathophysiological changes. Efforts to identify specific characteristics of each syndrome are an important beginning to the successful diagnosis and treatment of spinal injury pain. ⋯ Future research related to these hypotheses will need to focus on the use of appropriate injury models that simulate the pathological changes associated with human injuries and which lead to clinically relevant pain-related behaviors. Continued research directed towards an examination of these proposed mechanisms will also require new research strategies and a cooperative working relationship between basic and clinical scientists. In this review the clinical characteristics of spinal injury pain and the results of experimental studies are discussed.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Manipulation of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation variables has no effect on two models of experimental pain in humans.
Two separate studies investigated the hypoalgesic effect of manipulation of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) parameters on two models of experimental pain: the Submaximal Effort Tourniquet Technique and cold-pressor pain. For the first study, 32 healthy subjects (16 male and 16 female) attended once for the purpose of cold-pressor pain induction that involved immersion of the nondominant hand in a water bath at 0 degree C. Subjects were allocated to Control, Placebo, or 1 of 2 treatment groups (110 or 4-Hz TENS). ⋯ Measurements of "current pain intensity" and "worst pain experienced" were obtained via the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and the McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ), respectively. Analysis of variance performed on both sets of collected data revealed no significant differences between any of the groups, thus indicating no apparent relevance of manipulation of TENS parameters using these models of pain. Several hypotheses are suggested to explain these findings.