Article Notes
This analysis is not practice-changing, but instead highlights our continued lack of understanding of the outcome benefit (or not) of neuraxial versus general anaesthesia in high risk patient groups.
Interestingly, it is also a meta-analysis of meta-analyses, demonstrating that there are limits to the answers that re-analysing existing data may provide.
Comparing PECARN, CATCH, and CHALICE Rules for Children With Minor Head Injury along with two modalities of physician judgement showed significant variation in the sensitivities and specificities of the five modalities. Only physician practice and PECARN identified all traumatic brain injuries at a cost of lower specificity compared with CHALICE.
I like that POISE is another example in anaesthesia and peri-operative medicine of where surgery and anaesthesia themselves are not sufficient indications for intervening in a way (ie. starting peri-operative beta-blockers) that is not otherwise medically indicated (ie. as Allan notes, 'requiring beta blockade for cardiac reasons'). Screening coronary angiograms and revascularisation before major surgery are other examples.
There is a bit of "when will we learn?" to the beta-blockade story.