Article Notes
-
Buprenorphine is also a kappa and delta receptor antagonist, a weak partial NOP/Nociceptin receptor agonist, and has potent local anaesthetic effects. It behaves as a full agonist for analgesia in the opioid-naive, but a partial agonist for respiratory depression. ↩
- Very few ASA 4 (5%) patients were enrolled.
- Only volatile-maintenance anaesthesia was studied not propofol/TIVA.
- We can draw no conclusion regarding the consequences of extreme-depth (ie. BIS << 35).
- The actual depth difference between the BIS-35 and BIS-50 groups was not as much as perhaps ideal: mean BIS 39 vs 47 respectively...
The title of this paper is pretty vague and possibly even misleading: “unexpectedly unfavorable outcomes”...? Generally ‘outcome’ is used in service to something broader and longer-term, such as procedural success, long-term comfort, time to discharge, or functional recovery.
A more appropriate and descriptive title would have been: “Remifentanil for abdominal surgery is associated with worse analgesia and more PONV in the PACU.” 👍
Daniel Jolley
Although we know that OIH and AOT are issues for remifentanil and may explain the PACU analgesia differences observed in this study, it’s also possible that worse PACU pain scores occur because anesthetists/anesthesiologists have not adequately transitioned from short-acting to longer-acting analgesics at the end of the case.
That is, the findings may represent inadequate pre-emergence analgesia because of the complexity of managing pharmacokinetic transitions, rather than a direct pharmacodynamic effect of remifentanil...
My money is still on this being acute hyperalgesia and tolerance, but keep an open mind...
Daniel Jolley
What’s the relevance?
Remifentanil’s ultrashort-acting kinetics have driven its growth as a reliable technique for maintaining intraoperative analgesia. It is now one of the most widely used synthetic opioids in anesthesia.
However these unique pharmacological characteristics are associated with both Opioid Induced Hyperalgesia and Acute Opioid Tolerance, and possibly increase the risk of chronic pain after surgery.
Details:
Niedermayer and team performed a large, multicenter, propensity-matched observational study of remifentanil use during intra-abdominal surgery, and its association with postoperative pain in the PACU. Importantly the patients receiving epidural analgesia in addition to TIVA GA were also included. Volatile GA was excluded.
Among 16,420 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 3,652 GA/TIVA patients received remifentanil and were matched to 3,318 controls, and 829 GA/epi received remifentanil, being matched to 631 controls. Mean remifentanil infusions rates were 0.11 and 0.13 mcg/kg/min for non-EA and EA groups respectively.
They showed:
Among GA-only patients, remifentanil was associated with higher PACU pain scores (both on arrival and discharge), greater analgesic requirements and more PONV – however there was no decrease of either time-to-extubation or PACU discharge.
Interestingly, the epidural analgesia cohort also showed higher PACU pain scores when receiving remifentanil.
The rapid nociceptive changes due to remifentil are well known, however real clincial consequences remain unclear. This large observational study highlights the detrimental analgesic effects of remifentanil in the most immediate post-op period, reminding anesthetists and anesthesiologists that gold-standard intraoperative analgesia may come at a cost.
Dig deeper
Explore collected articles answering: Is remifentanil associated with Opioid Induced Hyperalgesia and Acute Opioid Tolerance?
Daniel Jolley
Why is this important?
Buprenorphine (Subutex, Tamgesic, Suboxone, Norspan) is a partial opioid agonist with high mu-receptor affinity, though limited by a ceiling effect. Because of its favourable safety profile it is used for opioid dependence, chronic and, increasingly, acute pain.1
Patients historically often have regular buprenorphine (BUP) ceased post-operatively when needing opioid analgesia. It was assumed that because of it’s high mu-receptor affinity, BUP blocks the efficacy of additional opioid analgesics. In reality, ceasing buprenorphine creates more complexity and may precipitate acute withdrawal.
Be smart
Haber, DeFries & Martin point out that despite the high receptor affinity of BUP, there are still additional receptors remaining for full-agonist opioids to bind and activate. This is supported by the literature (Kornfeld 2010 & Harrison 2018). Even in the post-operative period buprenorphine can be easily continued, although with patients sometimes needing higher doses of acute opioid analgesics (Goel 2019 & Hansen 2016).
“Temporarily discontinuing buprenorphine introduces unnecessary complexity to a hospitalization, places the patient at risk of exacerbation of pain, opioid withdrawal...“
Bottom-line
If buprenorphine is regularly being taken then it should not be ceased for hospital admission. Additional short-acting opioids can be added if needed. Doses required may be higher, but this is primarily due to opioid tolerance rather than receptor competition with BUP. Alternatively, a maintenance BUP dose can be split into 3-4 divided doses and/or increased to cover acute analgesic needs.
Daniel Jolley
What’s all the fuss?
Significant observational evidence suggested an association between mortality and deep anaesthesia, in particular a 2017 meta-analysis. However it has been suspected that anaesthetic depth may merely be a surrogate marker for intraoperative hypotension, a well-established risk factor for post-operative mortality and morbidity.
With this large RCT, the Balanced Anaesthesia Study Group has shown that deep general anaesthesia is not associated with an increase 1-year mortality.
What did they do?
The researchers conducted an ambitious, large (6,644 patients), multi-center, randomised controlled trial. Patients aged ≥60 years undergoing major surgery (expected ≥2h surgery and ≥2d hospital stay) were randomised to receive volatile general anaesthesia targeting BIS 50 or BIS 35.
To minimise intra-operative blood pressure as a confounder, anaesthetists were required to specify a target MAP before BIS-group allocation.
They found...
Not only was there no mortality difference between the BIS 50 and BIS 35 groups, there were also no major or moderate morbidity differences, or difference in recovery or length of stay. BIS targets were adequately achieved, though not perfect, and MAP was clinically similar for both groups.
Context is everything
This is about as high-quality as a large, modern study looking at longer-term outcomes can get. It is widely applicable to most populations and common general anaesthetic scenarios, except for a few important caveats:
Final thought
...there was (only) one case of awareness in the light-depth BIS 50 group, despite 39% of patients receiving volatile < 0.7 MAC.
Daniel Jolley
Pholcodine, rocuronium and suxamethonium, showing common tertiary/quaternary ammonium epitopes.