• Br J Gen Pract · Jun 2020

    An exploration of stakeholders' perceptions of the extent to which the individual and collective views of patients with long-term conditions and their carers are heard and used to inform commissioning decisions within primary care.

    • Jane Brooks.
    • University of Portsmouth.
    • Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 1; 70 (suppl 1).

    BackgroundInvolving patients and carers in decisions that influence the delivery of health services is a statutory requirement across the NHS. However, current evidence suggests a gap exists between the theory, legislation and policy intentions and their practical implementation.AimThis research aimed to identify the nature and extent of that perceived gap.MethodAdopting a mixed-methods approach using questionnaires and semi-structured interviews, stakeholders' perceptions were explored regarding the extent to which the views of patients with long-term conditions and their carers are heard and used within primary care, across four clinical commissioning groups. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse the quantitative data; thematic analysis was applied to explore the qualitative data.ResultsData analysis demonstrated considerable difference between patients' and carers' perceptions and those of healthcare professionals regarding how well involvement is implemented. Three key themes emerged that were perceived to influence the effectiveness of involvement. These related to the need for effective communication of relevant, accessible information that meets people's requirements; the need to take account of individuals' expectations, ability, motivation, assumptions, and previous experience; and the need for organisations to provide effective systems and processes, including adequate time and focused training to support involvement, in addition to robust monitoring and evaluation of the extent to which outputs from involvement influence commissioning decisions.ConclusionThe literature suggests that no existing framework addresses all three key themes. Therefore, a revised framework for involvement was developed, informed by the three key themes, that can be tested across a larger sample and different healthcare settings.© British Journal of General Practice 2020.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.