• Hiroyuki Takamaru, Yosuke Kawaguchi, Ichiro Oda, Masau Sekiguchi, Masayoshi Yamada, Seiichiro Abe, Satoru Nonaka, Haruhisa Suzuki, Shigetaka Yoshinaga, and Yutaka Saito.
• Endoscopy Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan. htakamar@ncc.go.jp.
• J Clin Monit Comput. 2021 Aug 1; 35 (4): 877-884.

AbstractPrevious studies documented the effectiveness and benefits of capnography monitoring during propofol-based sedation for colonoscopy to reduce the incidence of hypoxemia. However, the performance of capnography during longer duration endoscopic therapy of upper gastrointestinal tract cancers under CO2 insufflation it is not well known. In this study, we compare a new device with acoustic monitoring technology to standard capnography monitoring. We retrospectively analyzed 49 patients who underwent endoscopic resection of early upper gastrointestinal tract cancer between December 2013 and October 2014. All 49 patients were monitored using both acoustic monitoring technology and standard capnography. We investigated the duration of the periods with unmeasurable respiratory rate during the overall procedure. When comparing standard capnography monitoring to the new acoustic monitoring technology, the ratio of the unmeasurable time was significantly lower in RRa (36.9% vs. 21.6%, p < 0.01). The ratio of unmeasurable respiratory rate by capnography was strongly correlated to the ratio of unmeasurable PETCO2 level by capnography (R2 = 0.847). There were no severe events or adverse events (grade 2 or more) during all 49 procedures. The acoustic monitoring technology provides a more reliable respiratory monitoring when compared to standard capnography during endoscopic resection of upper gastrointestinal tract cancers under CO2 insufflation, even if the procedures were prolonged and complex.© 2020. Springer Nature B.V.

18 keywords...

hide…