• Yulin Tao, Qingjun Mao, and Jixiang Wang.
• Department of Anesthesiology.
• Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Apr 1; 99 (17): e19918.

BackgroundAdductor canal block has become a popular mode of pain management after total knee arthroplasty. This study compared a single-injection adductor canal block (SACB) with continuous adductor canal block (CACB). The hypothesis was that the 2 groups would have equivalent analgesia at 48 hours post-neural blockade.MethodsThis is a double-blinded, randomized, controlled, equivalency trial that is conducted at a single university hospital in China. A total of 60 patients who meet inclusion criteria are randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to either CACB (0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL followed by continuous infusion of 0.2% ropivacaine at 5 mL/h for 48 hours) or SACB (0.5% ropivacaine 20 mL) group. The primary outcome is pain scores at 48 hours utilizing the visual analog scale, whereas the secondary outcomes include opioid consumption, Timed Up & Go test, ambulation distances at discharge, length of stay, and maximal flexion at discharge. All pain scores are assessed by an independent observer who is blinded to the allocation of groups.ResultsThis study has limited inclusion and exclusion criteria and a well-controlled intervention. This clinical trial is expected to provide evidence of better therapy for the pain management after total knee arthroplasty.Trial RegistrationThis study protocol was registered in Research Registry (researchregistry5431).

31 keywords...

hide…