• M Wood, J Watkins, G Wild, C J Levy, and C Harrington.
• Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1985 Jan 1; 4 (2): 176-9.

AbstractIntradermal skin testing is widely used to determine the causative drugs of presumed anaphylactic anaesthetic reactions. This paper sets out to evaluate the usefulness of skin tests, both intradermal and prick testing, in the prediction of anaesthetic reactions. The muscle relaxant drugs tubocurarine and atracurium were chosen for study since they are known to produce a high incidence of minor histaminoid reactions. A trial was conducted in 22 female patients about to undergo elective gynaecological surgery for non-malignant conditions. In intradermal tests, positive wheal and flare reactions to one or other relaxant (diluted 1 in 1,000) occurred in 17 patients and reactions to both drugs in 11 patients. Despite this high incidence of positive reactions, none of the patients had received either drug previously, a view confirmed by the negative results of prick testing. Likewise, when anaesthetized for surgery using atracurium or tubocurarine allocated randomly, the minor histaminoid manifestations observed showed no correlation whatsoever with the intradermal tests results. The results of the trial, combined with external reports to this centre, indicate that intradermal testing of anaesthetic drugs, particularly muscle relaxants, produces a high incidence of false positive results. This probably reflects their pharmacological activity rather than antigenicity. It is recommended, therefore, that skin testing should be reserved for situations in which there are strong indications from laboratory tests, backed by case history, of immune sensitization.

20 keywords...

hide…