• Chest · Jan 2021

    Comparative Study

    Can acute cough characteristics from sound recordings differentiate common respiratory illnesses in children? A comparative prospective study.

    • Nina Bisballe-Müller, Anne B Chang, Erin J Plumb, Victor M Oguoma, Susanne Halken, and Gabrielle B McCallum.
    • Child Health Division, Menzies School of Health Research, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, NT, Australia; Department for Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark. Electronic address: ninabisballe@hotmail.com.
    • Chest. 2021 Jan 1; 159 (1): 259-269.

    BackgroundAcute respiratory illnesses cause substantial morbidity worldwide. Cough is a common symptom in these childhood respiratory illnesses, but no large cohort data are available on whether various cough characteristics can differentiate between these etiologies.Research QuestionCan various clinically based cough characteristics (frequency [daytime/ nighttime], the sound itself, or type [wet/dry]) be used to differentiate common etiologies (asthma, bronchiolitis, pneumonia, other acute respiratory infections) of acute cough in children?Study Design And MethodsBetween 2017 and 2019, children aged 2 weeks to ≤16 years, hospitalized with asthma, bronchiolitis, pneumonia, other acute respiratory infections, or control subjects were enrolled. Spontaneous coughs were digitally recorded over 24 hours except for the control subjects, who provided three voluntary coughs. Coughs were extracted and frequency defined (coughs/hour). Cough sounds and type were assessed independently by two observers blinded to the clinical data. Cough scored by a respiratory specialist was compared with discharge diagnosis using agreement (Cohen's kappa coefficient [қ]), sensitivity, and specificity. Caregiver-reported cough scores were related with objective cough frequency using Spearman coefficient (rs).ResultsA cohort of 148 children (n = 118 with respiratory illnesses, n = 30 control subjects), median age = 2.0 years (interquartile range, 0.7-3.9), 58% males, and 50% First Nations children were enrolled. In those with respiratory illnesses, caregiver-reported cough scores and wet cough (range, 42%-63%) was similar. Overall agreement in diagnosis between the respiratory specialist and discharge diagnosis was slight (қ = 0.13; 95% CI, 0.03 to 0.22). Among diagnoses, specificity (8%-74%) and sensitivity (53%-100%) varied. Interrater agreement in cough type (wet/dry) between blinded observers was almost perfect (қ = 0.89; 95% CI, 0.81 to 0.97). Objective cough frequency was significantly correlated with reported cough scores using visual analog scale (rs = 0.43; bias-corrected 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.56) and verbal categorical description daytime score (rs = 0.39; bias-corrected 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.54).InterpretationCough characteristics alone are not distinct enough to accurately differentiate between common acute respiratory illnesses in children.Copyright © 2020 American College of Chest Physicians. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…