-
- Marijn M L van den Houten, Sandra Jansen, Lijckle van der Laan, VriensPatrick W H EPWHEElisabeth Twee Steden Hospital, Department of Vascular Surgery, Tilburg, The Netherlands., Edith M Willigendael, KoelemayMark J WMJWAmsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam Cardiovascular Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands., ScheltingaMarc R MMRMMaxima Medical Centre, Department of Vascular Surgery, Veldhoven, The Netherlands., TeijinkJoep A WJAWCatharina Hospital, Department of Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.Maastricht University, CAPHRI Research School, Maastricht, The Netherlands., and ELECT Study Group.
- Catharina Hospital, Department of Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
- Ann. Surg. 2022 Mar 1; 275 (3): 609616609-616.
ObjectiveTo assess whether level of arterial obstruction determines the effectiveness of SET in patients with IC.Background DataGuidelines advocate SET before invasive treatment for IC, but early revascularization remains widespread, especially in patients with aortoiliac disease.MethodsPatients were recruited from 10 Dutch centers between October 2017 and October 2018. Participants received SET first, followed by endovascular or open revascularization in case of insufficient effect. They were grouped according to level of stenosis (aortoiliac, femoropopliteal, multilevel, or rest group with no significant stenosis). Changes from baseline walking performance (maximal and functional walking distance on a treadmill test, 6-minute walk test) and vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 at 3 and 6 months were compared, after multivariate adjustment for possible confounders. Freedom from revascularization was estimated with Kaplan-Meier analysis.ResultsSome 267 patients were eligible for analysis (aortoiliac n = 70, 26%; femoropopliteal n = 115, 43%; multilevel n = 69, 26%; rest n = 13, 5%). No between group differences in walking performance or vascular quality of life questionnaire-6 were found. Mean improvement in maximal walking distance after 6 months was 439 m [99% confidence interval (CI) 297-581], 466 m (99% CI 359-574), 353 m (99% CI 210-496), and 403 m (99% CI 58-749), respectively (P = 0.40). Freedom from intervention was 73.9% for aortoiliac disease and 88.6% for femoropopliteal disease (hazard ratio 2.46, 99% CI 0.96 - 6.30, P = 0.013).ConclusionsShort-term effectiveness of SET for IC is not determined by the location of stenosis. Although aortoiliac disease patients improved walking performance and health-related quality of life similarly compared to other arterial disease level groups, they underwent revascularization more often.Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.