-
Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. · Sep 2019
Validation of the Polish-language version of the COPD Assessment Test.
- Małgorzata Farnik, Grzegorz Brożek, Małgorzata Czajkowska-Malinowska, Rafał Krenke, Aleksander Kania, Marzena Trzaska-Sobczak, Beata Połtyn, Marta Miszczuk, Natalia Celejewska-Wójcik, Krzysztof Kuziemski, and Adam Barczyk.
- Department of Pneumonology, School of Medicine in Katowice, Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Poland. mfarnik@interia.pl
- Pol. Arch. Med. Wewn. 2019 Sep 30; 129 (9): 605-611.
IntroductionThe COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is a standardized patient-completed tool dedicated to assessment of symptom severity. While the Polish CAT version has been used for a few years, it has not been validated so far.ObjectivesThe aim of the study was to validate the Polish‑language version of the CAT questionnaire by assessing its reproducibility and reliability.Patients And MethodsValidation of the Polish‑language version of the CAT questionnaire was a substudy of the international multicenter observational cross‑sectional POPE survey of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in Central and Eastern European countries. The study was completed in 395 outpatients with stable disease at least 4 weeks before the survey. Validation was performed with the use of the Spearman correlation and Cronbach α coefficients, Cohen κ test, and the Bland-Altman procedure.ResultsThe internal consistency assessed by the Cronbach α coefficient was 0.87 for the questionnaire and 0.84 to 0.86 for its separate items. The repeatability of the questionnaire was good to very good (Cohen κ, 0.76-0.85; P <0.01). The Spearman coefficient for the sum of scores of test-retest responses was 0.95 (P <0.01). The Bland-Altman analysis revealed very good test-retest and interrater reliability, with the mean difference between test I and test II results of -0.556 (95% CI, -0.345 to 0.767).ConclusionsThe Polish version of the CAT questionnaire is a reproducible and reliable instrument for evaluation of patients with COPD and should be recommended for use in clinical practice.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.