• Cedric Lefebvre, Nicholas Hartman, Janet Tooze, and David Manthey.
• Department of Emergency Medicine, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA clefebvr@wakehealth.edu.
• Postgrad Med J. 2020 Sep 1; 96 (1139): 511-514.

BackgroundAlthough the concept of medical specialty competitiveness may seem intuitive, there are very little existing empirical data on the determinants of specialty competitiveness in USA. An understanding of the determinants of specialty competitiveness may inform career choices among students and their advisors. Specialty competitiveness correlates with availability and appeal.MethodsThis narrative review examines 2019 National Resident Matching Program (NRMP) data and the existing literature to define the determinants of specialty competitiveness. A statistical analysis of key elements of the 2019 NRMP data was performed.ResultsUsing US senior applicant fill rate as a measure of competitiveness, medical specialty competitiveness follows general principles of supply and demand. The demand, or appeal, of a specialty correlates with several factors, including salary, prestige and lifestyle. Salary correlates strongly with US senior fill rate (r=0.78, p=0.001). Relatively few positions are available for the most competitive specialties in the NRMP match. The negative correlation between US senior fill rate and position availability is also strong (r=-0.85; p<0.0001).ConclusionA 'competitive specialty' correlates strongly with high earnings potential and limited position availability. In an ideal world, a student's pursuit of a medical specialty should be guided by interest, qualifications and ability to succeed in that field. However, students must contend with the realities of competition created by the residency matching system.© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

11 keywords...

hide…