-
Journal of women's health · May 2017
GRACE Score Validation in Predicting Hospital Mortality: Analysis of the Role of Sex.
- Eva de-Miguel-Balsa, Jaime Latour-Pérez, Anna Baeza-Román, Cristina Amorós-Verdú, and Juan Antonio Fernández-Lozano.
- Intensive Care and Coronary Unit, Hospital General Universitario de Elche, Elche, Spain.
- J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2017 May 1; 26 (5): 420-425.
Abstract Background: The GRACE (Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events) risk score is recommended for risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome (ACS). It does not include sex, a variable strongly associated with ACS prognosis. The aim of this study was to examine if sex adds prognostic information to the GRACE score in a contemporary population. Materials and Methods: Analysis of discrimination and calibration of GRACE score in the validation population, derived from the ARIAM-SEMICYUC registry (2012-2015). Outcome was hospital mortality. The uniformity of fit of the score was tested in predefined subpopulations: with and without ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI and NSTEMI). Results: A total of 9781 patients were included: 4598 with NSTEMI (28% women) and 5183 with STEMI (23% women). Discriminative capacity of the GRACE score was significantly lower in women with STEMI compared to men (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC] 0.82, 95% CI 0.78-0.86 vs. AUC 0.90, 95% CI 0.88-0.92, p = 0.0006). In multivariate analysis, female sex predicted hospital mortality independently of GRACE in STEMI (p = 0.019) but not in NSTEMI (p = 0.356) (interaction p = 0.0308). However, neither the AUC nor the net reclassification index (NRI) improved by including female sex in the STEMI subpopulation (NRI 0.0011, 95% CI -0.023 to 0.025; p = 0.928). Conclusions: Although female sex was an independent predictor of hospital mortality in the STEMI subpopulation, it does not substantially improve the discriminative ability of GRACE score.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.