• J Clin Anesth · Dec 2020

    Randomized Controlled Trial

    Comparative dose-response study of hyperbaric ropivacaine for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in singleton versus twin pregnancies.

    • Zhong Mei, Ngan KeeWarwick DWDDepartment of Anesthesiology, Sidra Medicine, Doha, Qatar., Zhi-Min Sheng, Li-Juan Hu, Zhan-Huai Wu, Chang-Cheng Lyu, Xin-Zhong Chen, and Xiao-Wei Qian.
    • Department of Anesthesiology, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China; Department of Anesthesiology, Zhejiang Xiaoshan Hospital, Hangzhou, China.
    • J Clin Anesth. 2020 Dec 1; 67: 110068.

    Study ObjectiveIt is controversial whether local anesthetic dose requirement for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery differs between patients with singleton and patients with multiple gestation pregnancies. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the ED50 and ED90 for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in patients with singleton pregnancies versus patients with twin pregnancies.DesignProspective, randomized, comparative dose-finding study.SettingOperating room, Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine.Patients100 patients with singleton pregnancies (Group S) and 100 patients with twin pregnancies (Group T) presenting for scheduled cesarean delivery under combined spinal-epidural anesthesia were enrolled in the study.InterventionsPatients in Group S or Group T were randomly allocated to receive 9.5, 11, 12.5, 14 or 15.5 mg of hyperbaric ropivacaine intrathecally. A dose was considered effective when it achieved a bilateral sensory block level at the T6 dermatome or above within 10 min after intrathecal injection, there was no numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score ≥ 3 intraoperatively, and there was no requirement for epidural supplementation at any time during anesthesia and operation. Values for ED50 and ED90 for ropivacaine were determined using probit regression. The difference in ropivacaine dose requirement between patients with singleton pregnancies and patients with twin pregnancies was assessed by calculating relative median potency.MeasurementsSuccess rates for different intrathecal doses of ropivacaine, side effects and neonatal outcomes were recorded.Main ResultsThe estimated (95% confidence interval) values for ED50 and ED90 of intrathecal ropivacaine in patients with singleton pregnancies were 11.2 (10.2 to 12.0) mg and 15.7 (14.4 to 18.3) mg, respectively. The values for ED50 and ED90 in patients with twin pregnancies were 10.5 (9.5 to 11.3) mg and 14.8 mg (13.6 to 17.0) mg, respectively. The estimate of relative median potency for ropivacaine between patients with singleton and twin pregnancies was 0.94 (95% confidence interval 0.83 to 1.04).ConclusionPatients with singleton and twin pregnancies have similar dose requirement for hyperbaric ropivacaine used for spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery in the setting of combined spinal-epidural (CSE) anesthesia, no opioids, low weight cohort, insertion with the patients in the right lateral position, and norepinephrine boluses.Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.