• Ya-Ping Pan, Ya-Ping Fang, Yuan-Hong Xu, Zhong-Xin Wang, and Ji-Lu Shen.
• Clin Lab. 2017 Feb 1; 63 (2): 277-285.

BackgroundWe compared the diagnostic utility of procalcitonin (PCT), C-reactive protein (CRP), and hematological markers, including white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophils (NEU), percentage of neutrophils (NEU%), lymphocytes (LYM), neutrophil-lymphocyte count ratio (NLCR), and platelet count (PLT) for predicting bloodstream infection (BSI), which was confirmed by blood culture (BC).MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted for 1807 inpatients. The level of PCT, CRP, blood cells, and blood culture results were compared between the positive blood culture group and negative blood culture group; each indicator was analyzed in the performance of bacterial BSI diagnosis by drawing ROC curves.ResultsBlood cultures were positive in 230 patients; hence, the prevalence of bacteremia was 12.7%. There were significant differences in the median value for each marker between positive group BCs and negative group BCs (p < 0.05). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curves (ROC-AUCs) of PCT, CRP, WBC, NEU, NUE%, LYM, NLCR, and PLT for discriminating positive BCs from negative BCs were 0.811, 0.654, 0.612, 0.634, 0.684, 0.595, 0.682, and 0.633 respectively. PCT concentrations of gram-negative (14.94 ng/mL, IQR 2.93  48.76) were significantly higher than gram-positive (4.74 ng/mL, IQR 1.22  17.5) and fungal (1.47 ng/mL, IQR 0.66  35.34).ConclusionsPCT proved to be the most reliable predictor of BSI, second were NEU% and NLCR. A higher PCT level was found in patients with a gram-negative BSI compared to gram-positive BSI and fungal BSI.

28 keywords...

hide…