-
AJR Am J Roentgenol · Mar 2016
Reassessment and Follow-Up Results of BI-RADS Category 3 Lesions Detected on Screening Breast Ultrasound.
- Eun Young Chae, Joo Hee Cha, Hee Jung Shin, Woo Jung Choi, and Hak Hee Kim.
- 1 All authors: Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan, College of Medicine, 388-1 Pungnap-2-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul 138-736, Korea.
- AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016 Mar 1; 206 (3): 666-72.
ObjectiveThe purpose of this study is to determine the frequency and the malignancy rate of BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected on screening breast ultrasound and to reassess whether they satisfied the requirements of the American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) 6666 protocol.Materials And MethodsOf 28,796 asymptomatic women who underwent screening mammography during 2 years, 12,187 underwent additional ultrasound as part of the screening. Patients for whom BI-RADS category 3 lesions were seen on the ultrasound were selected. We reviewed the initial ultrasound showing BI-RADS category 3 lesions and mammograms. We also investigated the clinical outcome of these lesions using the reference standard of a combination of pathologic analysis and follow-up for at least 24 months.ResultsThe frequency of BI-RADS category 3 lesions detected on screening ultrasound was 14.6% (1783/12,187). Of the 1164 patients with a follow-up duration of at least 24 months or whose lesions were biopsied, eight were eventually proven to have malignancy (0.7%). The malignancy rate was 2.2% (4/184) for patients with abnormal mammograms and 0.4% (4/980) for those with normal mammograms. When the ACRIN 6666 protocols were strictly applied, 225 (19.3%) lesions were retrospectively recategorized as BI-RADS category 4 (n = 12) or category 2 (n = 213). All detected malignancies were early breast cancers with no lymph node metastasis.ConclusionAlthough the frequency of ultrasound BI-RADS category 3 lesions is considerably high (14.6%), the malignancy rate is very low (0.7%), especially in patients with a normal mammogram. Therefore, with BI-RADS category 3 assessment, careful evaluation is required to avoid unnecessary short-interval follow-up or biopsy.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.