-
Cardiovasc Revasc Med · Jul 2009
Comparative StudyHead-to-head comparison of bivalirudin versus heparin without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients with acute myocardial infarction undergoing primary angioplasty.
- Laurent Bonello, Axel de Labriolle, Probal Roy, Daniel H Steinberg, Pinto Slottow Tina L TL, Zhenyi Xue, Kimberly Kaneshige, Rebecca Torguson, William O Suddath, Lowell F Satler, Kenneth M Kent, Augusto D Pichard, and Ron Waksman.
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Washington Hospital Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.
- Cardiovasc Revasc Med. 2009 Jul 1; 10 (3): 156-61.
BackgroundIn patients receiving primary percutaneous coronary intervention for ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors has been demonstrated to be noninferior to heparin plus systematic GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors in preventing recurrent ischemic events with improved safety in terms of bleeding. However, no study has been performed comparing head-to-head bivalirudin with heparin without GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor infusion in STEMI patients.MethodsWe retrospectively studied 899 consecutive patients who presented with STEMI treated by primary angioplasty within 12 h after symptoms. Among them, 566 received bivalirudin and 333 received unfractionated heparin. Their in-hospital outcome in terms of efficacy and safety was assessed using rates of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and major bleeding, respectively. Clinical, angiographic and procedural characteristics were well matched between the two groups.ResultsPatients in the heparin group more frequently required intra-aortic balloon pumping (6.6% vs. 3.6%, P=.037). Regarding the safety end point, the MACE rate, including death, ischemic stroke and urgent repeated revascularization, was low and similar in both groups (2.7% bivalirudin vs. 1.2% heparin, P=.15). The rate of major bleeding, including major hematoma, gastrointestinal bleeding and hematocrit drop >15% during hospitalization, was high and identical in the two groups (4.1% bivalirudin vs. 4.2% heparin, P=.92).ConclusionThis study suggests that bivalirudin and heparin present similar safety and efficacy profiles when used without GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor infusion during primary angioplasty.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.