-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
The efficacy of automated intermittent boluses for continuous femoral nerve block: a prospective, randomized comparison to continuous infusions.
- M Gabriel Hillegass, Larry C Field, Scott R Stewart, Jeffrey J Borckardt, Luke Dong, Peggy E Kotlowski, Harry A Demos, H Del Schutte, and Scott T Reeves.
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425-2400, USA.
- J Clin Anesth. 2013 Jun 1;25(4):281-8.
Study ObjectiveTo determine whether an automated intermittent bolus technique provides enhanced analgesia compared with a continuous infusion for femoral nerve block.DesignProspective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01226927).SettingPerioperative areas and orthopedic surgical ward of a university hospital.Patients45 ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 patients undergoing unilateral primary total knee arthroplasty.InterventionsAll patients received single-injection sciatic and femoral nerve blocks plus femoral nerve catheter placement for postoperative analgesia. Patients were randomly assigned to an automated intermittent bolus (5 mL every 30 min with 0.1 mL/hr basal rate) or a continuous infusion (10.1 mL/hr) delivery method of 0.2% ropivacaine.MeasurementsConsumption of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) and visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores were assessed postoperatively at set intervals until the morning of postoperative day (POD) 2.Main ResultsThe mean (SEM) cumulative IV-PCA dose (mg of hydromorphone) for the 36-hour postoperative interval measured was 12.9 ± 2.32 in the continuous infusion rate group (n = 20) and 7.8 ± 1.02 in the intermittent bolus group [n = 21, t(39) = 2.04, P = 0.048; a 39 ± 14% difference in total usage]. Pain scores were statistically significantly lower in the intermittent bolus group in the afternoon of POD 1 (t(39) = 2.47, P = 0.018), but were otherwise similar.ConclusionsAn automated intermittent bolus infusion technique for femoral nerve catheters is associated with clinically and statistically significantly less IV-PCA use (ie, an opioid-sparing effect) than a continuous infusion technique.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Notes
Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
- Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as
*italics*
,_underline_
or**bold**
. - Superscript can be denoted by
<sup>text</sup>
and subscript<sub>text</sub>
. - Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines
1. 2. 3.
, hyphens-
or asterisks*
. - Links can be included with:
[my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
- Images can be included with:
![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
- For footnotes use
[^1](This is a footnote.)
inline. - Or use an inline reference
[^1]
to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document[^1]: This is a long footnote.
.