• Elisabeth Dewhirst, Marco Corridore, Jan Klamar, Allan Beebe, Julie Rice, N'diris Barry, and Joseph D Tobias.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH 43205, USA. elisabeth.dewhirst@osumc.edu
• J Clin Anesth. 2013 Jun 1;25(4):309-13.

Study ObjectiveTo assess the accuracy of a noninvasive continuous arterial pressure (CNAP) monitor in patients who are positioned prone in the operating room.DesignProspective study.SettingOperating room at a children's hospital.Patients20 pediatric patients, aged 13.8 ± 2 years, and weight 63.7 ± 18.8 kg, scheduled for surgery in the prone position, and for which arterial catheter placement was planned.InterventionsMeasurements were recorded with an arterial line (AL) and a new noninvasive continuous blood pressure (BP) monitor.MeasurementsSystolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean arterial (MAP) pressure readings were captured from an arterial cannula and the CNAP device every minute during anesthesia.Main ResultsThe study cohort consisted of analysis of 4104 pairs of SBP, DBP, and MAP values, which showed an absolute difference between the AL and CNAP device readings of 7.9 ± 6.3 mmHg for SBP, 5.3 ± 4.3 mmHg for DBP, and 4.6 ± 3.9 mmHg for MAP. Bland-Altman analysis of MAP values showed a bias of 0.26 mmHg, with upper and lower limits of agreement of 12.18 mmHg and -11.67 mmHg, respectively. CNAP readings deviated from arterial values by ≤ 5 mmHg in 67% of MAP values, 59% of DBP values, and 43% of SBP readings. The difference was ≤ 10 mmHg for 94% of MAP readings, 90% of DBP values, and 73% of SBP readings.ConclusionsDuring prone positioning, the CNAP monitor provided clinically acceptable accuracy for MAP values, similar to those reported in adults in the supine position.Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

22 keywords...

hide…