• Medicine · Oct 2020

    Comparative Study

    Comparative efficacy of bariatric surgery for type 2 diabetes mellitus: A protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis.

    • Xixiong Wang, Cunren Chen, Buping Zheng, Xiaolong Yang, Xiaoxin Zhang, and Chenchen Yang.
    • Department of surgical oncology, Boao Evergrande International Hospital, Qionghai.
    • Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23; 99 (43): e22755e22755.

    BackgroundThe comparative efficacy of bariatric surgical procedures for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) has not been completely elucidated. To investigate this question, we conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis.MethodsThe protocol followed preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) checklist. Two review authors will independently search the PubMed, Embase (Ovid), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The primary outcome is T2DM remission. The secondary outcomes include BMI, HbA1c (%), and percentage excess weight loss (% EWL). Results from the network meta-analysis will be presented as summary relative effect sizes (WMD or RR) and relative 95% CIs for each possible pair of treatments. Outcomes will be combined based on different periods of follow-up (12 months, 36 months, and 60 months).ResultsThe results will provide useful information about the efficacy of bariatric surgical procedures in patients with T2DM.ConclusionThe findings of the study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed journal.Inplasy Registration NumberINPLASY202050053.

      Pubmed     Free full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.