• Spine · Dec 2002

    Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial

    One versus two BAK fusion cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis: a randomized, controlled prospective study in 25 patients with minimum two-year follow-up.

    • Jie Zhao, Xinwei Wang, Tiesheng Hou, and Shisheng He.
    • Orthopedic Surgery Department, Changhai Hospital, Shanghai, People's Republic of China. orth.wang@263.net
    • Spine. 2002 Dec 15; 27 (24): 2753-7.

    Study DesignWe accomplish posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral insertion of a single BAK fusion cage (Sulzer Spine-Tech, Minneapolis, MN) with unilateral facetectomy and hemilaminectomy.ObjectiveTo subject a single BAK fusion cage inserted posterolaterally in posterior lumbar interbody fusion to a randomized, controlled trial to assess its clinical safety and efficacy.Summary Of Background DataRoutinely, two threaded cages in posterior lumbar interbody fusion have been recommended, which need bilateral facetectomy, extensive exposure, and retraction of cauda equina. Our biomechanical study showed that it is feasible to accomplish posterior lumbar interbody fusion using posterolateral insertion of a single threaded cage with unilateral facetectomy and hemilaminectomy.Materials And MethodsPatients with a primary diagnosis of L4-L5 degenerative spondylolisthesis accompanied by low back pain and unilateral leg pain, having failed conservative treatment, were considered for the procedure. Twenty-five patients were randomized into two groups of 13 and 12, respectively, using a random number table. Group 1 had a single BAK fusion cage inserted posterolaterally and oriented counter anterolaterally on the symptomatic side with unilateral facetectomy and hemilaminectomy. Group 2 had two BAK fusion cages inserted posteriorly with bilateral facetectomy and laminectomy.ResultsA total of 12 of 13 patients in Group 1 and 11 of 12 patients in Group 2 achieved successful radiographic arthrodesis. Clinical results at 2 years for 7 of 13 patients in Group 1 were excellent, 4 of 13 were good, 2 of 13 fair, and no poor clinical results; 4 of 12 patients in Group 2 were excellent, 5 of 12 good, 1 of 12 fair, and 2 of 12 poor. Regarding complications, 2 of 12 in Group 2 had a postoperative motor and sensory deficit of the opposite adjacent (upper) nerve root.ConclusionPosterior lumbar interbody fusion using diagonal insertion of a single threaded cage by a posterior approach with unilateral facetectomy enables sufficient decompression and solid interbody arthrodesis to be achieved while maintaining a majority of the posterior elements. It is a clinically safe, easy, and economic technique to treat lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,694,794 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.