• Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi · Apr 2019

    [Respiratory pathogen spectrum in pulmonary exacerbation of bronchiectasis in adults and its association with disease severity].

    • Y H Gao, W J Guan, Y N Zhu, R C Chen, and G J Zhang.
    • Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou 510120, China.
    • Zhonghua Jie He He Hu Xi Za Zhi. 2019 Apr 12; 42 (4): 254-261.

    AbstractObjective: To determine the pattern of respiratory pathogens at bronchiectasis exacerbation and its associations with disease severity. Methods: A total of 119 steady-state bronchiectasis patients [42 males, 77 females, age range 19 to 74 years, mean age (45±14)years], diagnosed by a compatible history combined with evidence of bronchial dilatation on high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), were recruited prospectively from out-patient clinics in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University between September 2012 and March 2013. A comprehensive history taking, radiologic appearance, spirometry, sputum bacterial culture and 16 respiratory viruses in nasopharyngeal swabs and sputum samples by PCR assays were collected at steady-state bronchiectasis. All bronchiectasis patients were followed up one year and assessed for bacteriology, virology and systemic inflammatory indices [including white blood cell, C-reactive protein (CRP), interleukin-6, 8 and tumor necrosis factor-α] during bronchiectasis exacerbation. Results: Fifty-eight bronchiectasis patients [20 males, 38 females, age range 19 to 74 years, mean age (44±14) years] reported 100 exacerbations (1 to 5 exacerbation events per patient) during one year follow-up. Respiratory viruses were found more frequently in sputum and nasal swab during exacerbation [35.0% (35/100) and 39% (39/100)] than those during steady-state in bronchiectasis [sputum: 13.8% (8/58), nasal swab: 8.6% (5/58)] (χ(2)=8.33,χ(2)=13.51; respectively, all P<0.05). The rate of bacterial detection during exacerbation in sputum was 56% (56/100), which was not significantly different compared with those at steady-state (35/58, 60.3%;χ(2)=0.284, P=0.59). Of these respiratory infections, viral-bacterial co-infection accounted for 30% exacerbation events. The most common bacteria and viruses during exacerbation in mild bronchiectasis (n=18, with 25 exacerbation events) were Haemophilus parainfluenzae (4 cases) in sputum and influenza A in nasal swab or sputum (4 cases), respectively. In patients with moderate (n=17, with 29 exacerbation events)-severe bronchiectasis (n=23, with 46 exacerbation events), pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common bacteria in sputum (35 cases), and the most common respiratory viruses were rhinovirus in nasal swab or sputum (11 cases). In these 100 exacerbation events, patients with bacterial and viral co-infection, pure bacteria infection, pure virus infection, no bacteria and virus infection accounted for 30, 29, 16 and 25 exacerbation events, respectively. And patients with co-infection had higher serum CRP (45±23) mg/L and IL-8 [9.0 (4.4-15.5) ng/L] (F=23.32, F=9.81,respectively; all P<0.05), and increased risk of hospitalization (30% vs. 0] compared with those in non-infectious group(χ(2)=9.0, P=0.003). Conclusions: Pseudomonas aeruginosa, rhinovirus and influenza A were common causative agents of exacerbation in bronchiectasis.In patients with moderate-severe bronchiectasis, pseudomonas aeruginosa was the most common bacterium in sputum, and the most common respiratory virus was rhinovirus in nasal swab or sputum, compared to Haemophilus parainfluenzae in sputum and influenza A in nasal swab or sputum in mild bronchiectasis. Patients with co-infection had more severe systemic inflammatory response and higher risk of hospitalization during exacerbation.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.