• Joost van den Dool, Bart Visser, Johannes H Koelman, Raoul H Engelbert, and Marina A Tijssen.
• Department of Neurology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands; ACHIEVE Centre of Applied Research, Faculty of Health, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
• Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2019 Aug 1; 100 (8): 1417-1425.

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effectiveness of a specialized physical therapy (SPT) program on disability in cervical dystonia (CD) compared to regular physical therapy (RPT).DesignA single-blinded randomized controlled trial.SettingThis study was performed by a physical therapist in a primary health care setting. Measurements were performed at baseline, 6 and 12 months in the botulinum toxin (BoNT) outpatient clinic of the neurology department.ParticipantsPatients with primary CD and stable on BoNT treatment for 1 year (N=96).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was disability assessed with the Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS). Secondary outcomes were pain, anxiety, depression, quality of life (QOL), and health related costs over 12 months.ResultsA total of 72 participants (30 men, 42 women) finished the study: 40 received SPT, 32 RPT. No significant between group differences were found after 12 months of treatment (P=.326). Over these 12 months both groups improved significantly (P<.001) on the TWSTRS disability scale compared to baseline (SPT 1.7 points, RPT 1.0 points). Short Form 36 (SF-36) General Health Perceptions (P=.046) and self-perceived improvement (P=.007) showed significantly larger improvements after 12 months in favor of SPT. Total health related costs after 12 months were $1373±556 for SPT compared to $1614±917 for RPT.ConclusionSPT revealed no significant differences compared to RPT after 12 months of treatment on the TWSTRS disability scale. Both groups showed similar improvements compared to baseline. Positive results in the SPT group were higher patient perceived effects and general health perception. Treatment costs were lower in the SPT group. With lower costs and similar effects, the SPT program seems to be the preferred program to treat CD.Copyright © 2019 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

30 keywords...

hide…