• John T Schwartz, Brian H Cho, Peter Tang, Javin Schefflein, Varun Arvind, Jun S Kim, Amish H Doshi, and Samuel K Cho.
• Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
• Spine. 2021 Jun 15; 46 (12): E671E678E671-E678.

Study DesignCross-sectional database study.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to develop an algorithm for the automated measurement of spinopelvic parameters on lateral lumbar radiographs with comparable accuracy to surgeons.Summary Of Background DataSagittal alignment measurements are important for the evaluation of spinal disorders. Manual measurement methods are time-consuming and subject to rater-dependent error. Thus, a need exists to develop automated methods for obtaining sagittal measurements. Previous studies of automated measurement have been limited in accuracy, inapplicable to common plain films, or unable to measure pelvic parameters.MethodsImages from 816 patients receiving lateral lumbar radiographs were collected sequentially and used to develop a convolutional neural network (CNN) segmentation algorithm. A total of 653 (80%) of these radiographs were used to train and validate the CNN. This CNN was combined with a computer vision algorithm to create a pipeline for the fully automated measurement of spinopelvic parameters from lateral lumbar radiographs. The remaining 163 (20%) of radiographs were used to test this pipeline. Forty radiographs were selected from the test set and manually measured by three surgeons for comparison.ResultsThe CNN achieved an area under the receiver-operating curve of 0.956. Algorithm measurements of L1-S1 cobb angle, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, and sacral slope were not significantly different from surgeon measurement. In comparison to criterion standard measurement, the algorithm performed with a similar mean absolute difference to spine surgeons for L1-S1 Cobb angle (4.30° ± 4.14° vs. 4.99° ± 5.34°), pelvic tilt (2.14° ± 6.29° vs. 1.58° ± 5.97°), pelvic incidence (4.56° ± 5.40° vs. 3.74° ± 2.89°), and sacral slope (4.76° ± 6.93° vs. 4.75° ± 5.71°).ConclusionThis algorithm measures spinopelvic parameters on lateral lumbar radiographs with comparable accuracy to surgeons. The algorithm could be used to streamline clinical workflow or perform large scale studies of spinopelvic parameters.Level of Evidence: 3.Copyright © 2020 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

12 keywords...

hide…