• Emma K Austin, Tonelle Handley, Anthony S Kiem, Jane L Rich, Terry J Lewin, Hedda H Askland, Sara S Askarimarnani, David A Perkins, and Brian J Kelly.
• Centre for Water, Climate and Land, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW emma.austin@newcastle.edu.au.
• Med. J. Aust. 2018 Aug 20; 209 (4): 159-165.

ObjectivesTo investigate general and drought-related stress experienced by farmers at both the personal and community levels, and whether socio-demographic and community factors influence this stress.DesignMultivariate analysis of data from the Australian Rural Mental Health Study (ARMHS), a longitudinal cohort study (2007-2013).SettingNon-metropolitan New South Wales.ParticipantsSubset of 664 ARMHS participants (at baseline) who identified as living or working on a farm.Main Outcome MeasuresPersonal drought-related stress (PDS), community drought-related stress (CDS), and general psychological distress (K10 score).ResultsFarmers who were under 35, both lived and worked on a farm, experienced greater financial hardship, and were in outer regional, remote or very remote NSW reported PDS particularly frequently. Of these factors, only being under 35 and increased remoteness were associated with higher incidence of CDS. Mild wet weather during the prior 12 months reduced PDS and CDS but increased general distress. Moderate or extreme wet weather did not affect PDS or general distress, but moderate wet weather was associated with increased CDS. Drought-related stress and general psychological distress were influenced by different socio-demographic and community factors.ConclusionsFarmers in NSW experience significant stress about the effects of drought on themselves, their families, and their communities. Farmers who are younger, live and work on a farm, experience financial hardship, or are isolated are at particular risk of drought-related stress. Medical practitioners who provide assistance to farmers and farming communities can contribute to initiatives that relieve stress about drought.

23 keywords...

hide…