• John W M Agar, Carmel M Hawley, Charles R P George, Timothy H Mathew, Stephen P McDonald, and Peter G Kerr.
• Geelong Hospital, Geelong, VIC, Australia. johna@barwonhealth.org.au
• Med. J. Aust. 2010 Apr 5; 192 (7): 403-6.

AbstractIn the mid 1970s, home haemodialysis accounted for nearly half of all patients on dialysis, both in Australia and elsewhere. The advent of both peritoneal dialysis (itself a home therapy) and satellite haemodialysis resulted in a gradual attrition in the use of home haemodialysis. Since 2000, the introduction of nocturnal home haemodialysis has begun to change this pattern in Australia, with a sharp growth in the uptake of home haemodialysis. Home haemodialysis, which enables longer hours and more frequent treatments than facility-based (hospital or satellite centre) dialysis, appears to offer improved patient outcomes in observational studies; randomised studies are necessary to confirm these findings. Home haemodialysis is also a cheaper form of therapy than facility-based dialysis. As newer, simpler and more user-friendly equipment is emerging that will make home haemodialysis even more accessible and attractive to the consumer, we believe that this trend toward a greater uptake of home haemodialysis should and will continue.

11 keywords...

hide…