• Paul Atkinson, Sam Hunter, Ankona Banerjee, David Lewis, Jacqueline Fraser, James Milne, Laura Diegelmann, Hein Lamprecht, Melanie Stander, David Lussier, Chau Pham, Mandy Peach, Luke Taylor, Ryan Henneberry, Michael Howlett, Jay Mekwan, Brian Ramrattan, Joanna Middleton, Daniel J Van Hoving, George Stoica, James French, and Paul Olszynski.
• Emergency Medicine, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, CAN.
• Cureus. 2019 Nov 3; 11 (11): e6058.

AbstractIntroduction Our previously reported randomized-controlled-trial of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) for patients with undifferentiated hypotension in the emergency department (ED) showed no survival benefit with PoCUS. Here, we examine the data to see if PoCUS led to changes in the care delivered to patients with cardiogenic and non-cardiogenic shock. Methods A post-hoc analysis was completed on a database of 273 hypotensive ED patients randomized to standard care or PoCUS in six centres in Canada and South Africa. Shock categories recorded one hour after the ED presentation were used to define subcategories of shock. We analyzed initial intravenous fluid volumes, as well as rates of inotrope use and procedures. Results  261 patients could be classified as cardiogenic or non-cardiogenic shock types. Although there were expected differences in the mean fluid volume administered between patients with non-cardiogenic and cardiogenic shock (p-value<0.001), there was no difference between the control and PoCUS groups (mean non-cardiogenic control 1881mL (95% CI 1567-2195mL) vs non-cardiogenic PoCUS 1763mL (1525-2001mL); and cardiogenic control 680mL (28.4-1332mL) vs. cardiogenic PoCUS 744mL (370-1117mL; p= 0.67). Likewise, there were no differences in rates of inotrope administration nor procedures for any of the subcategories of shock between the control group and PoCUS group patients. Conclusion Despite differences in care delivered by subcategory of shock, we did not find any difference in key elements of emergency department care delivered between patients receiving PoCUS and those who did not. This may help explain the previously reported lack of outcome differences between groups.Copyright © 2019, Atkinson et al.

4 keywords...

hide…