• Br J Radiol · Dec 1992

    Comparative Study

    Comparison of a subjective and a quantitative assessment of the neonatal chest radiograph.

    • B Yuksel, A Greenough, and J Karani.
    • Department of Child Health, King's College Hospital, London, UK.
    • Br J Radiol. 1992 Dec 1; 65 (780): 1083-5.

    AbstractThe aim of this study was to assess if quantitative classification of the chest radiograph appearance at 7 days predicted chronic oxygen dependency (oxygen dependency beyond 8 weeks of age) more accurately than did subjective classification at 28 days of age. Thirty preterm infants, median gestational age 27 weeks, who had chest radiographs taken for clinical purposes at 7 and 28 days of age, were recruited into the study. The 7-day chest radiograph was scored according to the lung volume, presence of opacification, interstitial changes, pulmonary interstitial emphysema and cystic elements. The range of chest radiograph scores was from 0-18, a score of 18 indicating the most abnormal appearance. The 28-day chest radiograph was classified as Type I or Type II chronic lung disease (CLD), according to the presence or absence, respectively, of coarse reticulation. The median chest radiograph score at 7 days of the 30 infants was 5 (range 2-14). In predicting chronic oxygen dependency, a chest radiograph score of 5 at 7 days had 83% sensitivity and 75% specificity, but a diagnosis of Type II CLD at 28 days of age had only 67% sensitivity and 67% specificity. We conclude that a quantitative assessment of the chest radiograph appearance at 7 days is more useful than a subjective assessment at 28 days of age.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…