• Sabine Nabecker, Tobias Alexander Hornshaw, Robert Greif, Carl Conrad, Mara Rohrer, Lorenz Theiler, and Thomas Riva.
• From the Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Bern University Hospital, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland (SN, TAH, CC, RG, MR, TR), Department of Anesthesia and Pain Management, Sinai Health System, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada (SN), School of Medicine, Sigmund Freud University Vienna, Vienna, Austria (RG), Department of Anesthesia, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau (LT) and Swiss Air-Rescue Rega, Zurich, Switzerland (LT).
• Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2021 Mar 1; 38 (3): 302-308.

BackgroundInternational guidelines recommend cricothyroidotomy as a life-saving procedure for 'cannot intubate, cannot ventilate' situations. Although commercially available sets facilitate surgical cricothyroidotomy, regular training seems to be the key to success.ObjectivesThe goal was to investigate if trained anaesthetists are able to transfer their skill in one surgical cricothyroidotomy technique to another. The primary hypothesis postulated that trained anaesthetists could perform an emergency cricothyroidotomy equally fast and successfully with a pocketknife compared with a surgical cricothyroidotomy set.DesignCrossover noninferiority randomised controlled trial.SettingAfter written informed consent and ethics committee approval, this single-centre study was performed at the University Hospital of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.ParticipantsAltogether, 61 study participants already familiar with surgical cricothyroidotomy were included.InterventionThe use of a commercially available cricothyroidotomy set was compared with a short-bladed pocketknife and ballpoint pen barrel. A pig-larynx cadaver model including trachea, with pig skin overlaid, was used. Participants underwent additional training sessions in both procedures.Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome was the time necessary to position the tracheal tube or pen barrel in the trachea. Other outcome parameters were success rate, tracheal and laryngeal injuries and preferred device.ResultsCricothyroidotomy with the pocketknife was performed significantly faster and equally successfully as compared with the cricothyroidotomy sets. Tracheal and laryngeal injuries were similar in both groups. Paratracheal or submucosal placement of the pen barrel occurred in 32%, compared with 29% for the tracheal tube. Sixty-six per cent of participants preferred the cricothyroidotomy set.ConclusionRegularly trained anaesthetists are able to accomplish cricothyroidotomy irrespective of the equipment used. A pocketknife with a ballpoint pen barrel was just as effective as a commercially available surgical set.Copyright © 2021 European Society of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care. Unauthorized reproduction of this article is prohibited.

9 keywords...

hide…