• M S Uluer, M Sargin, F Akin, E Uluer, and O Sahin.
• Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Konya Training and Research Hospital, Konya, Turkey.
• Niger J Clin Pract. 2019 Nov 1; 22 (11): 1564-1569.

BackgroundAlthough the most popular anesthesia technique for cesarean is spinal anesthesia, its most common complication is post-dural puncture headache (PDPH).AimWe aimed to determine the effect of median and paramedian approaches during spinal anesthesia on PDPH in patients undergoing cesarean section.Subjects And Methods200 pregnant women between the ages of 19-45 years, ASA physical status II, scheduled to undergo elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia, were studied. The patients were randomized into two groups: Group M; (n = 100) spinal anesthesia with the median approach, Group PM; (n = 100) spinal anesthesia with paramedian approach. The patients were questioned for the possible occurrence of PDPH on the first, third and seventh postoperative days. A telephone follow-up call was used if the hospital stay was shorter than seven days. Post-dural puncture headache was evaluated according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders (ICHD-III) diagnostic criteria. Normally distributed data were summarized using mean and standard deviation. Skewed data were summarized using median (range).ResultsA total of 200 patients completed the study. There were no statistically different between the groups by comparing the incidence and characteristics of PDPH (32% vs. 28%, P = 0.548). Most patients rated their pain intensity during PDPH as mild to moderate in both groups (p = 0.721). PDPH onset time was 2 (1-4) days in Group PM versus 3 (1-7) days in Group M (p = 0.173). No patient needed for epidural blood patch in both groups.ConclusionsSpinal anesthesia with a median or paramedian approach at cesarean section has no effect on the incidence of PDPH, but we believe that there has been a need for further studies with larger or different patient populations.

27 keywords...

hide…