• World Neurosurg · May 2021

    Machine learning-based prediction of 6 months post-operative Karnofsky Performance Status in glioblastoma patients: capturing the real-life interaction of multiple clinical and oncological factors.

    • Giuseppe Maria Della Pepa, Valerio Maria Caccavella, Grazia Menna, Tamara Ius, Anna Maria Auricchio, Silvia Chiesa, Simona Gaudino, Enrico Marchese, and Alessandro Olivi.
    • Institute of Neurosurgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Catholic University, Rome, Italy.
    • World Neurosurg. 2021 May 1; 149: e866-e876.

    ObjectiveAbility to thrive after invasive and intensive treatment is an important parameter to assess in patients with glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) is used to identify those patients suitable for postoperative radiochemotherapy. The aim of the present study is to investigate whether machine learning (ML)-based models can reliably predict patients' KPS 6 months after surgery.MethodsA cohort of 416 patients undergoing surgery for a histopathologically confirmed GBM were collected from a multicentric database and split into a training and hold-out test set in an 80:20 ratio. Worsening of KPS at 6 months after surgery (compared with preoperative KPS) occurred in 138 patients (33.2%). Relevant preoperative, intraoperative, and immediately postoperative variables were selected by a recursive features selection algorithm (Boruta) and used to build 2 ML-based predictive models.ResultsA random forest classifier and a random forest regressor were trained to predict 6 months postoperative KPS as a categorical (worsening vs. stable/improving) and continuous variables; they achieved, respectively, an area under the curve of 0.81 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.84) and a mean absolute error of 4.4 (95% confidence interval, 4.0-4.7). Leveraging the predictive value resulting from the combination of independent variables, the random forest classifier outperformed conventional statistics (area under the curve improvement of +21%).ConclusionsTwo robust ML-based prediction models were successfully trained and internally validated. Considerable effort remains to improve the interpretation of the results when these predictions are used in a patient-centered care context.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…