• World Neurosurg · May 2021

    Intraoperative CT-assisted spinal navigation in dorsal cervical instrumentation - A prospective study on accuracy regarding different pathologies as well as screw types.

    • Ulf Bertram, Tobias Philip Schmidt, Hans Clusmann, Walid Albanna, Christian Herren, Alexander Riabikin, Christian A Mueller, and Christian Blume.
    • Department of Neurosurgery, RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany. Electronic address: ubertram@ukaachen.de.
    • World Neurosurg. 2021 May 1; 149: e378-e385.

    BackgroundIntraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigated dorsal instrumentation has been successfully introduced as a new clinical standard. The proximity of vital anatomic structures makes cervical spine instrumentation an especially delicate task. Therefore, navigated approaches might prove to be beneficial. In this study, the accuracy of conventional instrumentation was compared with iCT navigated dorsal cervical spine instrumentation with focus on cervical pedicle screws (CPSs) versus lateral mass screws (LMSs) and pathologies.MethodsWe analyzed a prospective consecutive series of patients undergoing cervical dorsal instrumentation with iCT and spinal navigation and retrospectively analyzed a cohort that received conventional cervical instrumentation with C-arm fluoroscopy (control group). Accuracy was assessed with a modified Gertzbein-Robbins classification. Underlying pathologies were taken into account regarding accuracy in different entities.ResultsFifty-nine patients were treated using iCT (357 screws: 238 CPSs, 119 LMSs), and 98 patients underwent conventional instrumentation (632 screws: 69 CPSs, 563 LMSs). We achieved an initial accuracy of 93.28% (n = 220 screws) in the iCT group and 80.9% (n = 511 screws) in the control group (P < 0.001). Significant differences were found regarding the accuracy of CPS placement in cases of degenerative disorders (iCT vs. control; 94% vs. 63%; P < 0.001) and trauma (iCT vs. control; 88% vs. 72%; P < 0.05). iCT yielded favorable precision rates in regard to LMS placement (iCT vs. control; 94.2% vs. 82%; P < 0.05).ConclusionsAccuracy of iCT navigated instrumentation was significantly higher than conventional instrumentation. An overall tendency toward the use of CPSs with iCT navigation is evident, increasing the mechanical properties of the construct. iCT appears to be especially beneficial in elective surgery cases of degenerative spinal disorders.Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…