• Curēus · Sep 2020

    Clinico-Radiological Evaluation of Modified Stoppa Approach in Treatment of Acetabulum Fractures.

    • Surya V Singh, Rajesh K Chopra, Gyanendra Puri, Mozammil Pheroz, Sapan Kumar, Amit Bansal, Siddharth Gupta, Simarjot Sodhi, and Pritam Samanta.
    • Orthopaedics and Trauma, Central Institute of Orthopaedics, Vardhman Mahavir Medical College (VMMC) & Safdarjung Hospital, Delhi, IND.
    • Cureus. 2020 Sep 2; 12 (9): e10193.

    AbstractBackground The aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabulum fractures by analyzing clinical and radiological outcomes. Also, we assess intraoperative and postoperative complications of fracture treated by using Modified Stoppa approach. Objectives To evaluate clinical outcomes of Modified Stoppa approach by using Merle d'Aubigne hip score. To evaluate the radiological reduction quality of Modified Stoppa approach by using the criteria of Matta, and to assess complications of Modified Stoppa approach.  Method Thirty-two patients participated in this study (mean age 40 years; range 18-60 years) and the male to female ratio was 4:1, patients who underwent surgical intervention for acetabular fracture by using Modified Stoppa approach from Oct 2017 to April 2019 were included. Out of 32 patients, two were lost in follow up, leaving 30 of 32 patients for clinico-radiological analysis. We classified the fracture pattern according to Judet and Letournel classification based on preoperative X-ray AP view, Judet View, and 3D-CT pelvis. Operative time, blood loss, reduction quality, and perioperative complications were assessed in each patient. Clinical outcomes were assessed by Merle d'Aubigne hip score and radiological outcomes by criteria of Matta.  Results Out of 30 acetabulum fractures in 30 patients, three (10%) were categorized as anterior column fracture, one (3.3%) as transverse with posterior wall, one (3.33%) as T-type, six (20%) as anterior column with posterior hemi-transverse and 19 (63.33%) as both column fractures. In our study, most patients have trauma due to road traffic accident (RTA) in 25 (83.3%) and fall from stairs in three (10%) patients. Timing of surgery after trauma was average 5.83 days (range three to 15 days), Mean surgical time determined to be 214.66 min (range 150-350 min) and mean intraoperative loss 683.33 ml (range 230-1250 ml). Clinical outcomes by Merle d'Aubigne hip score was excellent in 13 (43.33%), good in 15 (50%), fair in two (6.66%) patients whereas poor results in 0 (0%) patient (p=0.001). Quality of reduction by Matta criteria was found to be an anatomical reduction in 26 (86.6%), imperfect reduction in three (10%), and poor reduction in one patient (3.33%) (p<0.001). Radiological grading by Matta criteria was excellent in 24 (80%), good in five (16.66%), and fair in one (3.33%) patient, and no patients met criteria for poor results (p<0.001). In operative complications one patient developed an external iliac vein injury which was repaired by a vascular surgeon, one patient had a superficial infection for which debridement, regular dressing, and IV antibiotics given and resolve in one month, obturator nerve injury in one patient which was resolve in five to six months, lateral femoral cutaneous nerve injury in one patient which resolved within three months and one patient urinary bladder injury which was repaired by a general surgeon.  Conclusion Our experience with Modified Stoppa approach for surgical treatment of acetabulum fracture in 30 patients is excellent and effective for better visualization to anterior column, quadrilateral plate, and up to sacroiliac joint. This approach provides better visibility of the fracture site which allows for good to an excellent reduction of fracture and fixation. Although Stoppa approach is cosmetic surgery in terms of scar size, there is less complication rate than the ilioinguinal approach.Copyright © 2020, Singh et al.

      Pubmed     Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

What will the 'Medical Journal of You' look like?

Start your free 21 day trial now.

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.