• J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol · Apr 2016

    CT angiography of the aorta using 80 kVp in combination with sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation: Effects on image quality and radiation dose.

    • Johannes Boos, Joel Aissa, Rotem S Lanzman, Philipp Heusch, Lars Schimmöller, Christoph Schleich, Christoph Thomas, Gerald Antoch, and Patric Kröpil.
    • Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medical Faculty, University Dusseldorf, Dusseldorf, Germany.
    • J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2016 Apr 1; 60 (2): 187-93.

    IntroductionThe objective of this study was to evaluate image quality and radiation dose of a CT angiography (CTA) protocol using 80 kVp in combination with iterative reconstruction and automated tube current modulation.MethodsNinety-five aortic CTA examinations were included in this study. A novel 80 kVp aortic CTA-protocol with iterative reconstruction was introduced in our department in March 2012 for patients with a body mass index (BMI) below 32 kg/m(2). The first 72 consecutive examinations were retrospectively assigned to group A (56 patients, 42 men, 14 women, mean age 69.6 ± 10.7 years, BMI range 19.7-31.1 kg/m(2)). For comparison, the last 23 consecutive examinations performed with the old protocol (100 kVp) were assigned to group B (21 patients, 13 men, 8 women, mean age 67.4 ± 11.1 years, BMI range 19.7-31.9 kg/m(2)). Thoracic and abdominal contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and aortic attenuation were assessed. Subjective image quality was rated on a 5-point scale (1 = non diagnostic; 5 = excellent). Furthermore, dose length product (DLP) and volumetric computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol) were analysed.ResultsAll examinations achieved diagnostic image quality. Attenuation of the aorta was significantly higher in group A compared with B (thoracic: 443.5 ± 90.5 Hounsfield units (HU) vs. 296.0 ± 61.0 HU; abdominal: 426.3 ± 94.2 HU vs. 283.6 ± 60.5 HU; P < 0.05, respectively). CNR, SNR and subjective image quality were comparable between both groups (CNR: 12.8 ± 3.7 vs. 13.0 ± 7.4; SNR 14.4 ± 3.9 vs. 14.9 ± 8.2; subjective image quality: 4.3 ± 0.6 vs. 4.5 ± 0.6; P > 0.05, respectively). CTDIvol and DLP were significantly lower in group A (1.9 ± 0.5 mGy; 139.2 ± 41.1 mGy × cm) as compared with group B (4.2 ± 1.4 mGy; 292.1 ± 91.5 mGy × cm; P < 0.001, respectively).ConclusionLow-dose CTA of the aorta using 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction enables a significant dose reduction of up to 50% compared with a 100 kVp protocol in patients with a BMI below 32 kg/m(2) while diagnostic image quality is maintained.© 2016 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…