• Spine · Feb 2012

    Prediction of the vertebral strength using a finite element model derived from low-dose biplanar imaging: benefits of subject-specific material properties.

    • Emilie Sapin-de Brosses, Erwan Jolivet, Christophe Travert, David Mitton, and Wafa Skalli.
    • Arts et Metiers Paris Tech, Bd de l'Hôpital, Paris, France. debrosses@gmail.com
    • Spine. 2012 Feb 1;37(3):E156-62.

    Study DesignA finite element analysis on osteoporotic vertebrae.ObjectiveThis study aims to validate subject-specific finite element models (FEMs) derived from a low-dose imaging system (EOS, Biospace Med, France) for the prediction of vertebral strength. The vertebrae are submitted to an eccentric compression force leading to compression and anterior bending.Summary Of Background DataGiven the aging population, osteoporosis and vertebral fractures are a major public health issue. A low bone mineral density (BMD) does not always explain incident fractures, and multifactorial analyses are required. In this context, FEMs based on quantitative computed tomography (QCT) have been proposed to predict vertebral strength in vitro or quantify effects of treatments. However, the clinical use of such a model for the in vivo follow-up of the whole spine is limited by the high-radiation dose induced by QCT and the lying position, which does not allow postural assessment with the same modality.MethodsFourteen vertebrae were modeled using a parametric meshing method. The mesh was subject-specific using geometric parameters computed on the 3-dimensional (3D) reconstructions obtained from the EOS biplanar radiographs. The contribution of cortical bone was taken into account by modeling a cortico-cancellous shell whose properties were derived from experimental data. The effect of subject-specific bone Young's moduli derived from EOS vertebral areal BMD was quantified. The 3D position of the point-of-load application and the 3D orientation of the force was faithfully reproduced in the model to compare the predicted strength and experimental strength under the same loading conditions.ResultsThe relative error of prediction decreased from 43% to 16% (2.5 times) when subject-specific mechanical properties, derived from EOS areal BMD, were implemented in the FEM compared with averaged material properties. The resulting subject-specific FEMs predicted vertebral strength with a level of significance close to the QCT-based models (r adjusted = 0.79, root mean square error = 367 N).ConclusionThis work underlines the potential of low-dose biplanar x-ray devices to make subject-specific FEMs for prediction of vertebral strength.

      Pubmed     Full text   Copy Citation     Plaintext  

      Add institutional full text...

    Notes

     
    Knowledge, pearl, summary or comment to share?
    300 characters remaining
    help        
    You can also include formatting, links, images and footnotes in your notes
    • Simple formatting can be added to notes, such as *italics*, _underline_ or **bold**.
    • Superscript can be denoted by <sup>text</sup> and subscript <sub>text</sub>.
    • Numbered or bulleted lists can be created using either numbered lines 1. 2. 3., hyphens - or asterisks *.
    • Links can be included with: [my link to pubmed](http://pubmed.com)
    • Images can be included with: ![alt text](https://bestmedicaljournal.com/study_graph.jpg "Image Title Text")
    • For footnotes use [^1](This is a footnote.) inline.
    • Or use an inline reference [^1] to refer to a longer footnote elseweher in the document [^1]: This is a long footnote..

    hide…

Want more great medical articles?

Keep up to date with a free trial of metajournal, personalized for your practice.
1,624,503 articles already indexed!

We guarantee your privacy. Your email address will not be shared.